Sure! Here’s a rewritten version of the content in American English, keeping it unique and ensuring it’s human-written:
Rahul Gandhi’s "Surrender" Comment Sparks Strong BJP Response
BJP Leader Labels Gandhi as "Rahul Munir" and "Rahul Sharif"
Congress Raises Questions About Foreign Parliamentary Visits
The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has strongly condemned Congress leader Rahul Gandhi for what they describe as an act that borders on "treason." Gandhi referred to Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s foreign policy as a "surrender" following Operation Sindoor, according to reports from Indian media.
On Wednesday, BJP President J.P. Nadda took to social media platform X (formerly Twitter) to criticize Gandhi’s statements, calling them an affront to the Indian armed forces and comparable to Pakistani propaganda. He stated, "To label the extraordinary bravery and valor of the Indian Army as a ‘surrender’ is not just regrettable but a serious insult to our military, the nation, and over 1.4 billion Indians."
"This can only be seen as treason," Nadda continued. "Rahul Gandhi, your party and its leaders may have a history of surrendering, but India will never yield."
In a barrage of posts, Nadda further accused the Congress party of a culture of capitulation: "The word ‘surrender’ is embedded in the Congress party’s lexicon; it’s in your DNA. You surrendered to terrorism, surrendered during the Sharm al-Sheikh talks, capitulated at Shimla after winning the 1971 war, and even conceded to the Muslim League at the dawn of India’s independence."
BJP spokesperson Sudhanshu Trivedi echoed Nadda’s sentiments during a press briefing, dubbing Gandhi "Rahul Munir" and "Rahul Sharif," claiming he has gone further than even Pakistan’s leadership in undermining India’s standing.
The BJP’s response came amid rising critiques from Congress and other parties within the INDIA coalition regarding the government’s approach to international relations, especially after the Pahalgam terror attack, and what they perceive as a manipulated narrative surrounding Operation Sindoor.
Later that evening, Congress MP Jairam Ramesh took to social media, targeting the government’s global outreach initiatives. He remarked, “The unusually low-profile External Affairs Minister is meeting with some parliamentary delegations that have returned. I hope there will be a sincere evaluation of what was truly achieved — not merely the spin.”
"There are credible reports that some countries greeted our MPs with a rather tepid reception, to say the least, and that the political significance of their meetings was subpar. Videos of MPs engaged in lighthearted activities during such a serious national mission have also been circulating."
Earlier on that day, Ramesh criticized the government’s scheduling of the upcoming monsoon session of Parliament, branding it as a strategy to avoid a special session requested by the opposition.
"Never before in Indian parliamentary history has a session been announced 47 days in advance,” he pointed out.
“Why was Operation Sindoor abruptly halted after four days? Why did President Trump mention 12 times in 20 days that the ceasefire was due to his intervention? These are the questions the Prime Minister is unwilling to answer.”
Union Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju confirmed that the monsoon session will commence on July 21 and run until August 12, marking the first session since Operation Sindoor.
The push for a special session was also echoed by Samajwadi Party MP Rajeev Rai, who recently participated in an all-party delegation visiting five countries — Russia, Slovenia, Greece, Latvia, and Spain.
“The Prime Minister should have called for the special session himself,” Rai insisted. “Back in 1962, during the peak of the war with China, first-time MP Atal Bihari Vajpayee demanded a special session amidst the conflict, and then Prime Minister Nehru complied. We acted in accordance with the spirit of the nation; now the government should uphold its responsibilities."
Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge reiterated the opposition’s demand for a special session to address critical issues, including the Pahalgam attack.
Adding to the controversy, Congress leader Pawan Khera claimed that India’s diplomatic standing has dwindled post-operation. “In Modi’s government, domestic policies are managed by trolls, while foreign policy is being dictated by someone who has capitulated,” he stated on social media.
He pointed to Kuwait lifting visa restrictions on Pakistan and signing agreements with them as indicative of India’s declining diplomatic influence. “That’s why it’s been said — ‘Name Narendra, work surrender,’” Khera added.
Feel free to ask if you need further modifications or any additional content!
