Tag: elections

  • Starmer Rises to Fight Despite Labour’s Poll Slump Nationwide

    Britain’s Prime Minister Keir Starmer addresses the media during a press conference at Downing Street in London, April 1, 2026. — Reuters

    – Starmer commits to continuing efforts to bring about change.
    – Voters penalize Starmer’s party across the country.
    – Farage praises what he calls a “historic shift” in British politics.

    LONDON: Prime Minister Keir Starmer pledged Friday to remain in office to implement change after his Labour Party endured significant losses in local elections across England and in parliamentary votes in Scotland and Wales, raising questions about his leadership capabilities.

    Less than two years after securing a decisive victory in a national election, Starmer’s support has waned, with voters withdrawing backing even in traditional Labour strongholds, including London, core industrial regions in central and northern England, and Wales.

    The biggest winner was Brexit advocate Nigel Farage’s populist Reform UK party, which gained over 1,000 council seats in England and is poised to serve as the main opposition in Scotland and Wales, where pro-independence parties like the Scottish National Party and Plaid Cymru hold sway.

    Early results reveal a fractured two-party system, with both Labour and Conservative parties losing votes to reformist uprisings, left-wing Green parties, and nationalist movements in Scotland and Wales.

    Starmer insists he won’t step down, despite the setbacks. His allies expressed support for a leader whose popularity ratings hit some of the lowest levels seen among British leaders.

    “I am not going to walk away,” Starmer told reporters in Ealing, West London, a rare area where Labour managed to hold onto control of the council.

    He showed humility by taking full responsibility for the losses, admitting that his government made unnecessary mistakes, including a failure to instill hope in Britain when his party first took power. However, he argued voters are more frustrated with the slow pace of change than with his government’s overall approach and promised to outline specific steps to achieve the change people want and deserve.

    In a move that appears to align with a recent government reset, Starmer pledged to intensify efforts to address the cost-of-living crisis, worsened by conflicts in Ukraine and Iran. This message boosted investor confidence, strengthening the pound against the dollar and lowering British borrowing costs—outperforming US and German debt.

    Nevertheless, Labour faced profound losses, notably in 136 local councils across England and in Scotland and Wales’ devolved parliaments. These results serve as a crucial barometer of public opinion ahead of the next general election, scheduled for 2029.

    While internal leadership challenges seem unlikely at this point, more than 20 Labour lawmakers have publicly and privately suggested that Starmer rethink his position and establish a timetable for stepping down.

    “The prime minister can’t take our party into the next election,” said Simon Opher, a Labour legislator from southwest England.

    Defense Secretary John Healey dismissed calls for a leadership change, stating that voters do not want the chaos of a leadership contest.

    “He’s not leaving, and there won’t be a timetable,” added Technology Secretary Liz Kendall during an interview with BBC News.

    Starmer’s task now is to reverse the downturn after losing control of several councils responsible for essential services and facing new nationalist governments in Scotland and Wales. First-time losses in areas like Tameside in Greater Manchester—where Labour had a near 50-year hold—and in Wigan, where Labour lost all 20 seats to Reform, underline the challenge.

    Reform UK’s showing was notable, capturing control of London’s Havering borough for the first time, and the Greens securing the mayoralty of Hackney, an area traditionally aligned with Labour. In Havering’s Romford, retiree Gary Orford summarized many voters’ sentiments, stating he would give Farage a chance after believing he had been misled by political promises. “You can only give him a chance,” he remarked.

    Polls forecast that Labour may suffer its worst loss of council seats since 1995. By Friday evening, Reform UK had gained 1,151 council seats in England, while Labour lost 1,015 seats. The Conservative Party was down by 466 seats. In Wales, Plaid Cymru secured the most seats in the Welsh Senedd, followed by Reform UK, with the Scottish National Party well ahead in Scotland’s parliament elections.

    These outcomes underscore how dramatically the British political landscape has shifted since 2017, when Labour and the Conservatives together garnered 82% of the vote in a general election. The rapid decline of support for Starmer’s Labour highlights the volatility of voter loyalty amidst recent leadership attempts, policy reversals, staff rotations, and scandals, including the controversy over Peter Mandelson’s appointment as Britain’s ambassador to the U.S.

  • Labour Loses Ground Early to Reform in UK Elections

    British Prime Minister Keir Starmer experienced significant early setbacks in local elections on Friday, highlighting widespread voter dissatisfaction with his administration and casting doubt on his leadership just two years after a decisive general election victory.

    Support for Starmer’s Labour Party plummeted in key areas overnight, including traditional strongholds in former industrial regions of central and northern England, as well as some parts of London.

    The biggest gains went to the anti-immigration populist Reform UK, led by Brexit supporter Nigel Farage, which captured over 200 council seats across England. Reform UK could emerge as the primary opposition in Scotland and Wales, challenging the Scottish National Party and Plaid Cymru, which favor independence.

    “Things have been pretty much as bad as anyone predicted for Labour—possibly worse,” said John Curtice, a leading polling expert in Britain.

    The elections for 136 local councils across England, alongside votes in the devolved Scottish and Welsh parliaments, serve as a major gauge of public opinion ahead of the next general election, scheduled for 2029.

    Party officials within Labour stated that if the party underperforms in Scotland, loses control of Welsh councils, and fails to defend many of the roughly 2,500 seats it currently holds in England, then Starmer could face increasing pressure to step down or set a timetable for his departure.

    Fragmentation of Britain’s Traditional Two-Party System

    Early results indicated a continued breakdown of Britain’s once-stable two-party system, signaling one of the most significant political shifts in the country in a century.

    The once-dominant Labour and Conservative parties are losing votes to Reform UK and the Green Party on the left, which advocates for environmental policies, while nationalist parties are poised to secure victories in Scotland and Wales.

    Farage remarked that the results exceeded expectations and signaled a “historic change in British politics.”

    In many key results, Labour suffered heavy losses. The party lost control of Tameside Council in Greater Manchester for the first time in nearly five decades, with Reform UK claiming all 14 seats Labour was defending. Similarly, Labour lost every one of the 20 seats it was defending in Wigan, a former mining town that has been under Labour control for over 50 years. In Salford, Labour holds just three out of 16 seats it was contesting.

    “These losses are soul-destroying,” said Rebecca Long-Bailey, a Labour Member of Parliament representing Salford.

    While mid-term election losses are typical for incumbent governments, polling suggests Labour could suffer its worst seat loss since 1995, when Prime Minister John Major’s government lost over 2,000 council seats amid widespread scandal.

    Reform UK added 253 council seats in England, with results pending in over 4,200 seats. Labour lost 185 seats, and the Conservatives dropped by 93.

    Most results—including those from Scottish and Welsh elections—are expected to be announced later on Friday.

    Scandals and Policy Reversals Weaken Starmer’s Authority

    Starmer, a former lawyer, was elected in 2024 with one of the largest parliamentary majorities in recent British history, promising stability amid political chaos, rather than charisma.

    However, his tenure has been marred by numerous policy reversals, a revolving door of advisers, and the controversial appointment and subsequent firing of Peter Mandelson as British ambassador to the United States, due to links to convicted U.S. sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

    Starmer maintains he will lead Labour into the next election, and the party has never successfully ousted a sitting prime minister in its 125-year history.

    The current political landscape is slightly tilted in Starmer’s favor, as the two leading contenders to succeed him—Greater Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham and ex-Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner—are currently not positioned to mount a challenge. Additionally, potential rivals seem hesitant to challenge him at this time.

    Energy Minister Ed Miliband dismissed reports from The Times suggesting he advised Starmer to consider setting a departure timetable from Downing Street.

    Political Uncertainty Persists

    Despite the setbacks, Starmer’s leadership remains intact for now, though the wave of losses in local elections underscores ongoing political instability and the challenge of uniting a fractured electorate.

  • India State Elections Highlight Growing Hindu-Muslim Divide

    Supporters of India’s ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) celebrate outside the party’s regional office in Kolkata, India, on May 4, 2026, as the party leads in the West Bengal state assembly elections. — Reuters

    In the recent elections across four states, the Congress party has gained increased Muslim voter support, while the BJP has solidified its base among Hindus, according to analysts. Adhikari describes the BJP’s victories in Assam and West Bengal as a triumph of Hindutva.

    PM Modi’s BJP opted not to run Muslim candidates in key regions, instead relying on strong Hindu voter backing for their wins. Data from the elections shows a clear trend: Muslim voters have increasingly supported the Congress party, while Hindu voters predominantly favored Modi’s BJP. This pattern underscores escalating religious polarization within the country’s secular framework, reflecting a persistent ideological divide between the two major parties.

    Since coming to power in 2014, Modi has championed a pro-Hindu agenda, with the BJP aligning with Hindutva—a Hindu-centric ideology. This voter split benefits the BJP, as Hindus make up nearly 80% of India’s 1.42 billion population, with Muslims constituting about 14%.

    Political analyst Rasheed Kidwai notes, “The rise of the BJP has prompted Muslim voters to consolidate behind so-called secular parties, especially Congress—what we’re witnessing is a form of reverse polarization.” Muslim leaders indicate that their communities are increasingly turning to Congress or regional parties over smaller parties that focus on Muslim issues but rarely enter government.

    The latest election results, announced this week, reveal Congress’s poor performance overall. The party gained control of just one state, while BJP-led coalitions overtook three others, and a regional group won the remaining contest. In Assam, where BJP maintains power, 18 of the 19 newly elected lawmakers are Muslim—up from about 16 in the last assembly. The BJP fielded 20 Muslim candidates out of 126 seats and won 82 seats overall. Meanwhile, the All India United Democratic Front (AIUDF), which primarily relies on Muslim support, saw its seats drop from 16 five years ago to just two.

    In West Bengal, which the BJP secured for the first time with 207 seats out of 294, the two Congress legislators elected were Muslim. Neither Assam nor West Bengal saw Muslim candidates from the BJP—support for the party was attributed by leaders, including Bengal’s prospective chief minister Suvendu Adhikari, to Hindu voters. “It was a victory for Hindutva,” Adhikari stated.

    Looking ahead, political columnist Radhika Ramaseshan suggests, “Depending on regional dynamics, Muslim voters might continue to consolidate behind Congress, prompting Hindu voters to rally more strongly around the BJP.” Congress has capitalized on fears among Muslim voters who feel marginalized under BJP rule and question their citizenship, argues Badruddin Ajmal, head of AIUDF.

    He adds, “The narrative is that only a party capable of challenging the BJP at the national level can address these concerns. While this isn’t entirely accurate, voters are scared.” In response, the BJP accuses Congress of becoming a “new Muslim League,” though Congress asserts Muslims constitute about 12% of its 664 state legislators nationwide, with Hindus making up approximately 78%, consistent with India’s demographics.

    Congress spokesperson Pawan Khera expressed discomfort over discussions of religion, emphasizing that the party has broad, inclusive support. “We’ve historically stood for the oppressed and vulnerable, regardless of their religion or caste, and we will continue to do so,” he affirmed.

    While the BJP has also sought Muslim outreach, it did not nominate Muslim candidates in the 2024 general elections. Modi has consistently denied using religion to win votes, asserting, “If I start talking about Hindus and Muslims in politics, I’ll lose my ability to serve the public. That’s my commitment.”

    However, Ramaseshan notes that religious rhetoric, particularly around election time, has sharply increased under Modi compared to earlier BJP leadership. “The BJP and its ideological parent, the Sangh, are shaping a new vision of India as a ‘Hindu Rashtra,’ and that narrative is increasingly influencing the national consciousness. This could lead to a fundamental shift in how India’s identity is perceived in the future,” she warns.

  • Indian CM declines to resign after BJP’s electoral win against Modi

    West Bengal’s Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee, leader of the Trinamool Congress (TMC), and Member of Parliament Abhishek Banerjee (right) hold a press conference as the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leads in the West Bengal state assembly elections, in Kolkata, India, May 5, 2026.— Reuters

    – The CM alleges election commission bias.
    – Banerjee’s tenure as CM concludes on Thursday.
    – The election commission dismisses the CM’s claims as groundless.

    An Indian state chief minister, who was ousted from power by Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s BJP in recent elections, declared on Tuesday that she had not been defeated and has no plans to resign, marking a significant political development.

    BJP emerged victorious over Banerjee’s TMC, which has governed West Bengal since 2011, by securing over two-thirds of the 294 seats tallied on Monday. Notably, BJP has never previously held power in West Bengal, a densely populated eastern state sharing borders with Bangladesh. The recent victory signifies a major milestone as the party now governs almost all eastern Indian states.

    The TMC’s seat count dropped sharply from 215 to 80, with Banerjee herself losing her legislative seat. She claimed that approximately 100 seats were “forcibly taken” from her party, alleging interference by a “biased” Election Commission—though she offered no supporting evidence.

    “I will not resign, I did not lose… officially, through the Election Commission, they (the BJP) can defeat us, but morally, we won the election,” she asserted during a press briefing.

    West Bengal’s Chief Electoral Officer Manoj Kumar Agarwal dismissed her allegations as “baseless.” BJP’s Suvendu Adhikari, who defeated Banerjee, stated that “everything is outlined in the constitution.”

    The Indian constitution allows the state’s governor to either request Banerjee’s resignation or wait for her term to naturally conclude. Once her term ends on Thursday, newly elected legislators will be sworn in, and a new government formation process will start.

    Banerjee has the right to challenge the election results in court on various grounds such as electoral malpractice, improper counting or rejection of votes or nominations, disqualification of candidates, or violation of election laws impacting the outcome. She has not indicated if she plans to pursue legal action.

    Prime Minister Modi, alongside his close aide and Home Minister Amit Shah, along with several senior BJP leaders, campaigned extensively in the state for weeks, highlighting issues like illegal immigration from Bangladesh and the struggling local economy under Banerjee’s leadership.

  • Modi Celebrates Historic Victory in West Bengal Opposition-Run State

    Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi greeted his supporters upon arriving at the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) headquarters, celebrating the party’s victory in the West Bengal and Assam state legislative elections in New Delhi on May 4, 2026.

    Votes are still being counted under tight security in the over 100 million-person state, one of five regions holding elections in April and May, with results expected to be announced soon.

    This victory is expected to strengthen Modi’s position as he faces ongoing economic and foreign policy hurdles, such as high unemployment and an upcoming U.S. trade agreement, ahead of the 2029 national elections.

    In West Bengal, a state where the BJP has never previously won, the party is leading in 156 of the 293 seats and has secured 48 others, based on data from the Election Commission of India.

    Modi shared on social media, “The 2026 West Bengal Assembly Elections will be remembered forever. The people’s power has triumphed, and BJP’s governance-oriented politics has prevailed.” He also credited the party’s dedicated workers across generations for the win, praising their efforts.

    Supporters and senior officials celebrated the victory exuberantly in Kolkata, dancing to celebratory music.

    The BJP, which is the ruling party at the national level, launched an aggressive campaign to oust Mamata Banerjee’s powerful regional party, which has been in control of West Bengal since 2011.

    During vote counting, clashes broke out at several centers, and police used batons to control crowds—a reminder of the violence that has characterized past elections. The campaign was notably marked by protests over the removal of millions of names from voter rolls, a move officially aimed at disqualifying ineligible voters but criticized as discriminatory against marginalized and minority groups.

  • Ex-Israeli Prime Ministers Join Forces to Oppose Netanyahu’s Bid

    Israeli opposition leader Yair Lapid announced on Sunday that he will team up with former Prime Minister Naftali Bennett ahead of the upcoming elections, aiming to unseat incumbent Benjamin Netanyahu.

    Lapid, who has served as Prime Minister before, stated that they will run together on a single list for the October parliamentary vote, with an official declaration expected later Sunday. On social media platform X, Lapid mentioned that they would “initiate the first step in repairing Israel: merging Yesh Atid and ‘Bennett 2026’ into one party led by Naftali Bennett.”

    He added, “This union consolidates the Repair Bloc, allowing us to focus all efforts on guiding Israel toward the necessary repair.” Both leaders have been vocal critics of Netanyahu’s management of the country’s conflicts since October 2023, with Lapid calling the recent two-week ceasefire with Iran a “political catastrophe.”

    Bennett, a right-wing advocate of Israeli settlements in the West Bank, and Lapid, a centrist, previously co-led a coalition government in June 2021. This government was replaced at the end of 2022 by Netanyahu’s current administration after Bennett declared his coalition fractured in June, leading Lapid to serve a short term as caretaker prime minister.

    Polls suggest Bennett is the most likely candidate to defeat Netanyahu in October’s vote. Bennett, 54, is the son of American immigrants and a former tech entrepreneur who sold his startup in 2005 for $145 million. An ex-elite Israeli commando officer, he resonates with younger Israelis, especially following over two years of conflict in Gaza.

    Once an adviser to Netanyahu, Bennett has since become a fierce critic of former mentor’s policies. He has led several right-wing parties before forming a unity government in 2021.

    Lapid, 62, is the son of the late journalist and minister Tommy Lapid, a Holocaust survivor, and the esteemed author Shulamit Lapid. A well-known TV journalist, he entered politics in 2012 with the founding of Yesh Atid, which quickly became Israel’s second-largest political party. He has served as opposition leader and held a brief stint as prime minister.

    Netanyahu, age 76, intends to head his Likud party’s list in the upcoming election, which must occur by the end of October. He remains Israel’s longest-serving prime minister, with over 18 years in office across multiple terms.

  • Modi Advocates for Greater Women’s Representation in Parliament Reform

    Modi Advocates for Greater Women’s Representation in Parliament Reform

    The Indian government is undertaking a comprehensive effort to reform its democratic framework. On Thursday, they introduced legislation aimed at expanding Parliament’s size and accelerating plans to reserve one-third of legislative seats for women. Opponents criticized these moves as attempts to influence electoral outcomes.

    Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced in the lower house of Parliament that these proposals, which also involve increasing the number of legislative members and women in regional assemblies and redistricting constituencies, would steer India toward a “new trajectory.” He expressed confidence that amplifying women’s voices would infuse the parliamentary process with fresh perspectives, strength, and increased sensitivity.

    The government explained that the adjustments to electoral boundaries are based on demographic shifts since the last seat allocations, which were set following the 1971 census.

    Opposition parties contend that changing constituency boundaries in this manner is unconstitutional. Since Modi’s ruling coalition, the National Democratic Alliance, lacks the supermajority required to pass the bills alone, they are seeking support from smaller parties and other opposition groups.

    While most opposition factions support quotas for women, they allege that the government is attempting to manipulate the system for political gain. They plan to oppose the legislation’s passage later this week. The Congress Party, leading the main opposition alliance, urged that the process be straightforward so that the women’s reservation can be implemented immediately once approved.

    The legislation proposes an increase in the lower house of Parliament by approximately 55%, raising the total seats to around 850 by the 2029 elections, with similar growth in state legislatures. The plan also includes reserving one-third of these new seats for women by that same year. This quota was originally established in legislation passed in 2023 but was tied to the upcoming census, delaying its implementation beyond the next election. Additionally, these proposals require approval from at least half of the state legislatures to become law.

    Currently, women in India represent nearly half of the country’s 968 million voters but hold only about 14% of seats in the lower house and 17% in the upper house of Parliament. Women constitute roughly 10% of state legislative members.

  • Kim Reappointed as North Korea’s State Affairs President

    Kim Reappointed as North Korea’s State Affairs President

    North Korea’s legislature has re-elected Kim Jong Un as the country’s leader, according to state media reports on Monday. The announcement was made by KCNA, North Korea’s official news agency. Kim’s reappointment as chairman of the State Affairs Commission, which is the highest policymaking and governing body, was confirmed during the first session of the 15th Supreme People’s Assembly.

    Critics argue that elections in North Korea are heavily scripted, serving more as a show than an actual democratic process. KCNA stated, “The Supreme People’s Assembly of the DPRK reelected Comrade Kim Jong Un as President of the State Affairs of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea during the First Session, marking the start of the 15th term.” The report added that this decision reflected the “unanimous will and desire of all the Korean people.”

    Kim, a third-generation ruler of the nuclear-armed nation founded by his grandfather Kim Il Sung in 1948, has been in power since 2011 following his father’s death. Experts such as Lee Ho-ryung from the Korea Institute for Defense Analyses view these elections as choreographed events with predetermined outcomes. She explained, “North Korea stages such events to project an image of political legitimacy, but no real change is expected.”

    Photos depict Kim dressed in a formal Western-style suit, seated centrally on a stage flanked by high-ranking officials, with large statues of his father Kim Jong Il and grandfather in the background.

    Ahead of the session, 687 deputies were elected to the assembly, with North Korean voters over 17 years old given the option to approve or reject the single candidate provided by the ruling party. The votes overwhelmingly supported Kim’s re-election, with 99.93% in favor and only 0.07% against, and a turnout of 99.99%, according to KCNA. The assembly was described as densely packed with members demonstrating “extraordinary political awareness and revolutionary enthusiasm.”

    Observers suggest that the current session may consider constitutional amendments, potentially including language to formally define inter-Korean relations as those between “two hostile states.” The tone used by Kim regarding South Korea during his speech will serve as an important indicator of his future policies toward the peninsula, according to Hong Min from the Korea Institute for National Unification. He said, “Changes in terminology from ‘reunification’ or ‘Korean unity’ to more aggressive language like ‘territorial control’ could reflect shifts in ideological stance.” The focus will likely be on how he addresses issues of territorial waters and airspace in dealings with Seoul.

    This session follows a larger, party-wide meeting held last month, which occurs every five years.

  • Nepal’s Rapper-Driven Centrist Party Nears Election Victory

    Nepal’s Rapper-Driven Centrist Party Nears Election Victory

    Nepal’s centrist RSP party, led by rapper-turned-politician Balendra Shah, secured a clear majority in the direct parliamentary elections, with partial official results indicating a strong lead and suggesting a landslide victory. The 35-year-old Shah’s Rastriya Swatantra Party (RSP) also led in the proportional representation votes, according to announced results and trends from the election commission.

    This election marked the first since the youth-led anti-corruption protests in September 2025, which resulted in the government’s fall. Shah himself defeated veteran four-time Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli in his own constituency—Oli’s Marxist-led government was ousted amid last year’s violence.

    His victory over the 74-year-old Oli and his rise from the mayor of Kathmandu to a potential prime minister highlights a dramatic shift in Nepali politics. The September protests, driven broadly by Generation Z under a loose banner, initially started over a social media ban but quickly expanded into a wider movement against corruption and economic struggles.

    Elections for Nepal’s 275-seat House of Representatives took place on Thursday, with 185 seats filled through direct votes and 110 through proportional representation. Election observers from the Asian Network for Free Elections described the voting process as peaceful and reflective of continued democratic engagement despite recent political turmoil.

    As of Sunday afternoon, 153 of the direct election results had been announced. Shah’s RSP led with 117 wins, followed by the Nepali Congress with 17, and Oli’s Marxist party trailing with seven. Prominent leader Pushpa Kamal Dahal, a three-time prime minister and former Maoist guerrilla commander, also secured his seat, with his party holding a total of seven seats.

    Trends indicated that Shah’s RSP was also leading in eight of the remaining 12 direct constituency races. In the proportional representation tally, RSP was further ahead with nearly half of the votes counted, though final tallies might take several days.

    Nepali Congress, the previous coalition’s largest party, saw its new leader, Gagan Thapa, defeated by Shah’s party. Election officials assured the public that counting was proceeding smoothly, with results expected soon for all direct races and additional days needed for the proportional representation results.

    Shah celebrated his victory Saturday evening with a parade through his new constituency, donning his signature dark sunglasses and greeting the crowds from a sunroof, where supporters chanted “Balen”—his nickname. Oli, who congratulated Shah, wished him “a smooth and successful five-year term.”

    Meanwhile, Nepal’s government-formed investigation commission into the September 2025 violence submitted its report Sunday, although no one has yet been held accountable for the deaths. The findings remain confidential pending public release. The commission collected evidence from over 200 witnesses and compiled a 900-page report, with an additional 8,000 pages of supplementary material. Its conclusions and recommendations are now with interim Prime Minister Sushila Karki for action.

    Oli denies ordering security forces to fire on protesters and attributes the violence to infiltrators, dismissing responsibility.

  • Nepal tallies votes following crucial post-uprising election

    Nepal tallies votes following crucial post-uprising election

    Nepal’s latest parliamentary election took place amid the aftermath of protests that led to the government’s overthrow in 2025. Counting is currently in progress, with initial results anticipated later today, though a complete count might take several days. The process has been peaceful, according to Election Commission spokesperson Prakash Nyupane, but the political landscape remains tense as parties await the final tally.

    Voters selected representatives to replace the interim government, which had been in place since a violent uprising last September that left at least 77 dead and resulted in widespread destruction of government buildings. The protests, initially sparked by a social media ban, evolved into a larger movement fueled by frustrations with corruption and a struggling economy.

    The vote is among the most fiercely contested in Nepal since the end of its civil war in 2006. Prominent candidates include a former prime minister with Marxist roots aiming to make a political comeback, a young rapper turned mayor appealing to the youth, and the newly elected leader of the Nepali Congress party.

    Polling stations reported a calm atmosphere, with thousands of security personnel deployed to maintain order. Key results are being watched closely in a regional district called Jhapa-5, where the main contenders face off. One challenger, KP Sharma Oli—ousted last year as prime minister—is seeking to regain power. He’s facing off against Balendra Shah, a 35-year-old rapper-turned-politician representing a centrist party, who is rallying young voters as a symbol of change. Gagan Thapa, leader of Nepal’s oldest party, also remains in the race, promising to bring fresh leadership.

    Over 3,400 candidates competed for 165 seats directly elected to the 275-member House of Representatives, with additional members chosen through party lists. Voter turnout reached nearly 60%. Many voters expressed hope that the election would produce a leader capable of guiding Nepal toward stability and progress, especially after recent sacrifices and decades of political upheaval.

    As the vote count continues, political analysts warn that forming a cohesive government might take time, especially if no single party secures a majority. The nation watches nervously, hopeful for a new path forward.

  • Experts Warn Iran War Threats Endanger Netanyahu’s Political Future

    Experts Warn Iran War Threats Endanger Netanyahu’s Political Future

    As elections draw near in Israel, President Benjamin Netanyahu sees the ongoing conflict with Iran as a chance to repair his image, which was heavily damaged by the October 7, 2023, Gaza attack, analysts say.

    However, the extent of any political gain will rely on how the conflict develops and its duration, they add.

    Following Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei’s, martyrdom during a series of US-Israeli airstrikes, Netanyahu asserted that his strong relationship with the US has allowed Israel to accomplish a goal he has pursued for four decades: decisively targeting the terrorist regime.

    The Gaza conflict has hurt Netanyahu’s standing with voters. Critics accuse him of trying to sidestep accountability for the government’s failure on the deadliest day in Israeli history.

    At 76, Netanyahu, who leads the right-wing Likud party, is Israel’s longest-serving prime minister, with over 18 years in office spread across multiple terms.

    He’s known for his political stamina but has been governing without a parliamentary majority since this summer due to disputes with ultra-Orthodox religious allies.

    Additionally, he is on trial for longstanding corruption charges and has sought a presidential pardon, with former President Donald Trump often urging President Isaac Herzog to grant one.

    “Total Victory”

    Elections are required to be conducted by October 27 at the latest.

    Political analyst Emmanuel Navon of Tel Aviv University predicts Netanyahu will call early elections.

    “It’s clear he won’t wait until October, especially with the anniversary of October 7 approaching,” Navon stated.

    “Although Netanyahu’s popularity plummeted after the Gaza attack, he has been gradually regaining ground,” he continued.

    Polls currently favor a Likud victory led by Netanyahu, which would likely result in him being tasked with forming the next government. Nonetheless, he still would not have enough seats to command a majority with his current coalition.

    A successful campaign against Iran could alter that scenario, experts suggest.

    “This operation clearly bolsters the image Netanyahu wants to project—the idea of a ‘total victory,’” explained independent geopolitical analyst Michael Horowitz to AFP.

    “Netanyahu aims to demonstrate that this isn’t just a campaign slogan but a reality; it’s part of his national agenda and electoral strategy,” he added.

    “Iran Remains Iran”

    Journalist Raviv Druker from Channel 13 remarked that Netanyahu might try to convince the public that victory is complete, even if it’s an illusion, noting that Hamas still controls Gaza and Iran remains a threat even after Saturday’s strikes.

    On the popular news site Walla, reporter Ouriel Deskal suggested that Netanyahu might have timed the hostilities to delay the March 30 deadline for passing a budget—one he has struggled to pass due to a fragile majority—by invoking a state of emergency.

    Without a budget, the government would collapse on April 1, triggering new elections.

    In this context, Netanyahu could enter the election campaign in a weakened position.

    Conversely, Navon said, “If this war against Iran proves successful for Israel, it would be a political victory for Netanyahu.”

    Yet, if the conflict prolongs, the political landscape could shift dramatically, Horowitz warned.

    “Public support for a prolonged war with significant casualties and rising living costs is very low,” he explained.

    During last June’s conflict, Iranian missiles killed 30 Israelis. Since Saturday, Iran has retaliated with strikes that have resulted in 10 deaths.

    Horowitz pointed out that Israel’s victories are largely credited to its military and civil resilience, enabling it to sustain its longest conflict in history.

    “While military approval is increasing, Netanyahu’s popularity isn’t necessarily rising accordingly,” he added.

  • UK Greens oust Labour in key Stronghold, Starmer Faces Setback

    UK Greens oust Labour in key Stronghold, Starmer Faces Setback

    Britain’s Prime Minister Keir Starmer addressed the House of Commons during Prime Minister’s Questions in London on February 25, 2026. — Reuters

    – A recent defeat intensifies the scrutiny facing unpopular Prime Minister Starmer.
    – Labour has dropped to third place in a seat once considered a safe stronghold.
    – The Green Party secures its first-ever parliamentary by-election victory.

    Manchester: Labour leader Keir Starmer’s party faced a humiliating loss to the Green Party in a Manchester constituency they have historically dominated for nearly a century. This upset highlights the growing instability in Britain’s traditional two-party system.

    The loss of Gorton and Denton, one of Labour’s most secure seats in this key electoral contest — the first in nearly a year — adds to the mounting pressure on Starmer to justify his leadership amid ongoing political turbulence and calls for his resignation.

    Hannah Spencer of the Green Party claimed victory in the vacant Gorton and Denton seat, following the resignation of longtime MP Andrew Gwynne. Nigel Farage’s Reform UK party finished second, with Labour trailing behind in third place.

    Labour Party chair Anna Turley described the outcome as “disappointing.” Renowned pollster John Curtice called this result a “seismic shift,” suggesting that the trajectory of British politics is more uncertain now than at any point since World War II.

    Starmer invested significant effort in this by-election, including preventing popular Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham from running and personally campaigning in the constituency — a move considered risky as British leaders typically avoid campaigning in districts where they might lose.

    The defeat follows recent turmoil including some Labour MPs questioning Starmer’s leadership over his decision to appoint veteran politician Peter Mandelson as ambassador to Washington, despite Mandelson’s controversial connections to Jeffrey Epstein.

    ### Pressure Mounts on Starmer Ahead of May Elections

    In the 2024 general election, Labour secured just over 50% of the vote in Gorton and Denton. However, rising unpopularity, sluggish economic growth, scandals, and policy reversals have severely eroded support for the party.

    Results from Friday’s by-election saw the Green Party capture 40.7% of votes, driven by issues such as opposition to NATO and support for the legalization of recreational drugs. Reform UK, led by Nigel Farage, came in second with 28.7%, while Labour garnered 25.4%.

    While by-elections typically favor the governing party, Labour’s significant loss to the Greens places increased pressure on Starmer, who has dismissed calls for him to step down and insists he will continue fighting.

    Insiders suggest Starmer might not face immediate repercussions unless his party performs poorly in upcoming local and regional races scheduled for May, including elections for Wales and Scotland.

    ### Voters Shift Political Allegiances, Fracturing Longstanding Loyalties

    Gorton and Denton, which encompasses areas once home to the Gallagher brothers of Oasis fame, was part of Labour’s historic “Red Wall”—a belt of industrial districts across England once deemed unassailable. This election underscored the unpredictable nature of the current political landscape, marked by waning loyalty and rising support for outsider parties on both the right and the left.

    This election marked the Green Party’s first victory in a parliamentary seat in northern England, boosting their total in the House of Commons to five out of 650 seats. Nationwide, five parties—including the Greens, Reform, and the Liberal Democrats—are polling in double digits, challenging the long-standing Labour-Conservative duopoly.

    Reform UK, which has only a handful of seats, has led national polls for over a year but faces challenges in winning in diverse urban areas. Their candidate, Matt Goodwin, faced criticism for previously making controversial statements about British Muslims, stirring concerns in communities with significant Muslim populations, including Gorton and Denton. Farage criticized the election outcome, labeling it “a victory for sectarian voting and cheating,” particularly in an area with active debates around Palestinian support.

    This election underscores the fluidity of national politics, with traditional loyalties continuing to fracture as new parties gain ground and voters seek alternatives beyond the established two-party system.

  • Bangladesh Starts Historic Election Amid 2024 Uprising

    Bangladesh Starts Historic Election Amid 2024 Uprising

    Bangladesh has launched its first national election since the violent protests that ousted Sheikh Hasina in 2024. Voters are lining up at polling stations nationwide amid tight race expectations.
    Tarique Rahman, 60, a leading candidate for prime minister, believes the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) can reclaim power, but faces strong opposition from Jamaat-e-Islami, the country’s largest Islamist party. Jamaat leader Shafiqur Rahman, 67, has managed a disciplined grassroots campaign and, if victorious, could lead the nation’s first Islamist-led government in a secular Bangladesh.
    Polls show a wide range of results, though most suggest BNP holds a possible lead, with some indicating a very close race.
    “Today’s significance is immense,” said interim leader Muhammad Yunus, who will step down after the election. “It will shape the future of the country, its democracy, its resilience, and the generations to come.”
    Yunus, 85, a Nobel Peace laureate, has led the country since Sheikh Hasina’s 15-year rule ended in August 2024. His government has disqualified her Awami League from participating in the elections. Hasina, 78, was sentenced in absentia for crimes against humanity related to a brutal crackdown on protesters while in power, and remains in hiding in neighboring India.
    Yunus has also advocated for sweeping democratic reforms, aiming to overhaul what he calls a “completely broken” political system and to prevent a return to single-party dominance.
    On Election Day, the 127 million voters will also decide whether to approve reforms including limits on prime ministerial terms, a new upper parliamentary chamber, enhanced presidential authority, and increased judicial independence.
    Voters will choose 300 lawmakers directly, with 50 additional women selected from party lists. Over 300,000 security personnel are on duty for the polls, which begin at 7:30 a.m. and will use manual count methods after closing at 4:30 p.m.
    Results, traditionally seen hours later, will also include referendum ballots. Experts emphasize the importance of a fair and impartial process, with all parties accepting the outcome, as a sign of genuine democratic renewal.
    The next government will inherit a strained economy—Bangladesh is the world’s second-largest textile exporter—and delicate relations with India. Rahman has pinpointed restoring security and stability as priorities if he wins, while acknowledging the enormous challenges ahead.
    “The economy has been devastated,” Rahman said. “Unemployment is high, and we need to create opportunities for our youth.”
    Meanwhile, his Islamist opponents campaign on promises of justice and anti-corruption efforts. Jamaat’s Rahman says he aims to unite the country and ensure leadership isn’t based on family backgrounds.
    Approximately 10% of Bangladesh’s population is non-Muslim, mostly Hindus.
    Before voting, Yunus called on citizens to honor the sacrifices of the 2024 uprising and prioritize national interests over personal or party agendas.
    “Victory and defeat are both part of democracy,” he said. “Let’s work together to build a just, inclusive Bangladesh.”

  • First Post-Hasina Election Sparks Hope Among Young Bangladeshi Voters

    First Post-Hasina Election Sparks Hope Among Young Bangladeshi Voters

    Millions of young Bangladeshis will cast their votes for the first time this Thursday in a historic election that will shape the nation’s leadership. This comes after a 2024 student-led uprising that effectively ended former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina’s authoritarian rule.

    Individuals aged 18 to 27 constitute 44% of the 129 million eligible voters. Many of these young voters admit they didn’t participate in voting during Hasina’s 15-year grip on power.

    Elections during her tenure were plagued with claims of extensive rigging and bans on opposition parties.

    Faijullah Wasif, 33, a university official preparing to vote for the first time, shared that he didn’t vote while Hasina was in office because he believed his vote wouldn’t matter.

    “I mostly stayed away out of fear and anxiety,” he explained. “I just wasn’t interested.”

    The large cohort of young voters has prompted political parties to adjust their campaign strategies and messaging.

    Digital platforms now play a central role in campaigning, with parties investing heavily in social media outreach, from Facebook videos to TikTok reels.

    Hasina’s former ruling party, the Awami League, is now disqualified from participating in this election.

    Instead, opposition groups—such as the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) and its allies, along with a coalition led by Jamaat-e-Islami, the country’s largest religious party—are contesting.

    Ashfah Binte Latif, 21, a student at Dhaka University, said her parents reminisced about elections from before Hasina’s era, when voting day was celebrated like a festival.

    “Now that we’ve managed to change the system, I am very excited,” she remarked.

    The National Citizen Party (NCP), created by student leaders who spearheaded the recent protests, has allied with Jamaat-e-Islami.

    Latif expected more leadership from the youth, but remains hopeful for change.

    “We hoped young people would lead us—and in many ways, they have,” she said. “If they fail, it’s a failure for all young people.”

    The unrest that sparked in 2024 began on university campuses, where students opposed a government quota system for civil service jobs, claiming it excluded them from employment opportunities.

    A year and a half later, Bangladesh’s economy remains delicate, and many recent graduates continue to struggle to secure their first jobs.

    Election expert Md Abdul Alim, a former member of the country’s election reform commission, anticipates a high youth turnout.

    “These young voters will carry their frustration into the polls, and they will vote,” he predicted.

    Of about 2,000 candidates vying for 350 seats—with roughly 1,400 running for the first time—over 600 are under the age of 44, according to electoral commission data.

    Wasif believes these fresh faces will benefit Bangladesh.

    “Our trust in young people is very strong, and our hopes are high,” he said.

    “Since youth led this change, I believe they will radically transform Bangladesh’s political landscape,” he added.

    Latif expressed hope that the new leadership would be more democratic.

    “A government that values dissenting voices instead of viewing them as enemies, that respects them,” she said.

  • India to Recall Diplomat Families from Bangladesh

    India to Recall Diplomat Families from Bangladesh

    India will withdraw its diplomats’ families and dependents from Bangladesh due to heightened security concerns ahead of the February 12 general election, according to an Indian official on Wednesday. The campaigning for Bangladesh’s elections kicks off Thursday, amid protests and counter-protests.

    The deteriorating relationship between India and Bangladesh worsened after former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina fled to India in 2024 following violent protests. The Indian official described the withdrawal as part of “internal readjustments” without providing further details. It’s unclear when the families will return to Bangladesh.

    Requests for comment from the foreign ministries of India and Bangladesh went unanswered. In December, India summoned Bangladesh’s high commissioner to express alarm over the worsening security situation, especially threats targeting the Indian mission in Dhaka. Bangladesh’s interim government, led by Nobel laureate Muhammad Yunus, has repeatedly sought Hasina’s extradition and dismissed India’s concerns about violence targeting the Hindu minority community.

    Relations between the two nations have remained tense since the Awami League government of Sheikh Hasina was ousted following student-led protests in mid-2024. Recently, protests erupted over the killing of student leader Sharif Osman Hadi, a vocal critic of India and participant in the 2024 protests. His death triggered violence, with mobs torching buildings, including two major newspapers believed to favor India and a prominent cultural center. Bangladeshi police reported that the suspects, Faisal Karim Masud and Alamgir Sheikh, exited Bangladesh through the Haluaghat border crossing into India.

  • New Zealand’s Landmark Vote Scheduled for November 7

    New Zealand’s Landmark Vote Scheduled for November 7

    Wellington: New Zealand Prime Minister Christopher Luxon announced that national elections will be held on November 7, emphasizing his administration’s achievements in the economy and crime reduction.

    Luxon noted that the election date, set one month after the All Blacks’ home game against Australia, was partly chosen based on the country’s sports schedules.

    A recent Taxpayers Union/Curia poll from last month showed the opposition Labour Party leading narrowly with 31.6% support, compared to 30.0% for Luxon’s Conservative National Party. However, the same survey indicated that Luxon’s coalition government is likely to stay in power, thanks to the backing of its partner parties.

    Luxon pledged to fulfill his government’s promise to focus on fundamental issues. “When we took office, the country was headed in the wrong direction. It has taken significant effort over the past two years to start reversing that trend,” he told reporters.

    “The economy is improving, with growing confidence among businesses and consumers. Manufacturing and construction are booming, and exports are performing exceptionally well.”

    He also mentioned that inflation has dropped from 7% under the previous administration to under 3%.

    Luxon highlighted a new free trade agreement with India, expecting legislation to ratify it to pass later this year.

    On crime, he praised his government’s efforts, stating, “Law enforcement is more visible on the streets, crime victims have decreased by 38,000, youth offending has fallen 16%, and ram raids have dropped 85%.”

  • Trump Celebrates Wins in White House Address as Approval Drops

    Trump Celebrates Wins in White House Address as Approval Drops

    In a rare evening speech from the White House, President Donald Trump highlighted his achievements and pointed fingers at his Democratic predecessor for rising consumer prices as his party prepares for a challenging midterm election next year.

    “Eleven months ago, I inherited a mess, and I am fixing it,” Trump stated at the outset.

    The Republican leader, who often claims he doesn’t get enough credit for his successes, emphasized his administration’s efforts this year to address issues like decreasing border crossings and reducing the prices of certain goods.

    This speech was a chance for Trump, if he focused on consistency, to respond to public concerns about affordability—a topic Trump, a Republican, has repeatedly dismissed as a Democratic deception. Once again on Wednesday, he blamed the previous Biden-led administration, despite admitting that prices still remain high.

    “I’m bringing down those high prices, and I’m doing it very quickly,” he claimed.

    Next year’s midterm elections see Trump’s Republican Party aiming to keep its control over the House and Senate. Meanwhile, Democrats are focusing on affordability issues and healthcare policy differences in hopes of gaining power.

    High inflation during Biden’s four-year term contributed to Trump defeating Kamala Harris in last year’s election. However, Trump’s tariff strategies this year have created uncertainty, pushing prices higher in an economy that his administration has been overseeing for nearly a year—making it difficult for Trump and Biden before him to convince Americans that the economy is in good shape.

    A recent Reuters/Ipsos poll found that just 33% of U.S. adults approve of Trump’s economic management.

    Instead of the usual setting in the Oval Office, Trump delivered his remarks in the White House’s Diplomatic Reception Room.

    Ahead of the speech, Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer from New York criticized Trump for not fulfilling his campaign promises.

    “He vowed to lower costs on Day One—that was his top promise and the main reason he won. Yet, costs keep climbing, higher than ever,” Schumer said during a news conference on Capitol Hill.