الوسم: air india

  • Air India A320 Nearly Lost Control During 300-Foot Descent: Report

    Air India A320 Nearly Lost Control During 300-Foot Descent: Report

    An Air India Airbus A320 experienced a brief loss of critical flight controls after all three hydraulic systems failed, according to an initial analysis by Airbus examined by Reuters. The incident occurred on August 4 during Flight AI2379 from Phuket to Delhi. Despite losing altitude, the plane safely landed in Delhi.

    The aircraft managed to lose elevator and aileron control for approximately four seconds before systems auto-recovered. During this moment, the plane pitched upward, with the first officer attempting a full nose-down input. However, there was no immediate response from the flight controls until hydraulic systems regained functionality.

    Airbus has instructed Air India to perform system and sensor checks and has requested further information but has not yet determined the definite cause. No statements have been made by Air India or Airbus at this stage.

    Indian authorities have classified the event as serious, and the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau is conducting an inquiry, assisted technically by Airbus and France’s BEA. A related issue surfaced when the captain tested positive for marijuana in a confirmatory drug test. While no link has been established between this and the altitude loss, Air India has recently initiated mandatory drug testing for all pilots through an internal memo.

  • Air India mandates drug tests for all pilots after captain’s marijuana positive

    Air India mandates drug tests for all pilots after captain’s marijuana positive

    Air India will implement mandatory drug testing for all pilots starting Thursday, following an internal memo and shortly after a pilot involved in a serious mid-air incident tested positive for marijuana. The new protocol will screen for substances and medications that are banned under aviation standards. These tests will be carried out during training sessions at the airline’s Gurugram training center, after flights at briefing locations, offices, or at places designated by pilots’ home bases.

    Testing will include pilots from Air India’s budget subsidiary, Air India Express. The airline has not responded immediately to requests for comment. Current regulations mandate that airlines randomly test at least 10% of their flight crews for psychoactive substances annually.

    However, Air India states that they now see the need to go further, emphasizing that the new measures are aimed at maintaining safety standards and reassuring passengers and stakeholders.

    This decision comes amid investigations into an August 4 incident where an Airbus A320neo flying from Phuket to Delhi suddenly lost around 300 feet of altitude during cruise. The pilot involved in that incident tested positive for marijuana in a confirmatory drug test, a source familiar with the situation revealed.

  • Air India Pilot Faces Confirmatory Drug Test After Flight Dive

    Air India Pilot Faces Confirmatory Drug Test After Flight Dive

    An Air India Airbus A350 aircraft is on display at Wings India 2024 aviation expo held at Begumpet Airport in Hyderabad, India, on January 18, 2024. — Reuters

    – Eight passengers and four cabin crew members were hospitalized following the incident.
    – Both pilots were subjected to a “psychoactive substance screening test.”
    – The Ministry classified the incident as a “Serious Incident.”

    The Indian Civil Aviation Ministry announced on Sunday that a pilot involved in a flight that experienced a sudden drop during turbulence—resulting in injuries to 17 passengers and crew—is currently undergoing a confirmation test for psychoactive drugs.

    The Airbus A320, operating from Phuket, Thailand, to New Delhi with 137 passengers and 8 crew members, lost approximately 300 feet (91 meters) on August 4 before stabilizing and completing a safe landing, the civil aviation authorities reported.

    Upon landing in India’s capital, eight passengers and four crew members were admitted to hospitals, with their conditions described as stable. The pilots underwent the standard psychoactive substance screening test, which indicated a need for further confirmatory testing.

    Samples have been sent to a designated laboratory for additional analysis, and the results are pending. The incident has been classified as a serious event, prompting an investigation by India’s Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB). Both pilots have been temporarily removed from their flying duties pending the investigation’s outcome.

    Further actions or disciplinary measures will be determined based on the investigation results and confirmatory test outcomes.

    Footage from the scene showed scattered cabin luggage across the aisle, and some of those injured were transported to the hospital on stretchers.

    Earlier Sunday, Air India confirmed that a post-flight screening test was conducted on the pilots but did not disclose the results.

    This incident marks a recent setback for the airline, which appointed a new executive on Wednesday. Since acquiring Air India in 2022, the Tata Group has launched an extensive modernization effort, including ordering hundreds of aircraft and updating its aging fleet.

    While the airline has made progress in streamlining operations and integrating various aviation businesses, it continues to face challenges such as delays in aircraft deliveries and disruptions due to regional conflicts, particularly stemming from the India-Pakistan tensions in 2025.

    The most significant blow to its reputation occurred in June 2025 when Flight 171, a Boeing 787 Dreamliner en route to London, crashed shortly after taking off from Ahmedabad, leading to the deaths of nearly all 242 onboard and 19 on the ground.

    In an effort to turn things around, the airline has appointed Tewolde Gebremariam, the former CEO of Ethiopian Airlines, as its new CEO, hoping his industry experience will help stabilize and restore confidence in the carrier.

  • Families Seek Answers One Year After Air India Crash

    Families Seek Answers One Year After Air India Crash

    Families of the victims from last year’s Air India flight crash gathered at the site on Friday to observe the anniversary, still waiting for clarity on what caused the tragedy.

    On June 12, 2025, a Boeing 787 collided with a medical college shortly after taking off from Ahmedabad in western India, resulting in 260 deaths — making it the deadliest aviation accident in a decade.

    Indian officials are expected to release an interim report soon, but relatives of the victims are frustrated, awaiting a comprehensive final explanation.

    Suresh Patni, a driver, visited the crash site where his teenage son Akash was engulfed in flames. “We’re here today only to remember him on his first death anniversary,” Patni shared with AFP.

    “Akash was a bright student and had so much potential,” he added, commemorating his son with a framed photo, a life-sized cutout, flowers, scattered rose petals, and lit lamps.

    The crash resulted in the deaths of 241 passengers on the plane and 19 individuals on the ground. Debris like bags, clothes, and a melted shoe remain partially buried in the scorched earth, with charred trees around.

    “Knowing an airplane is flying overhead still hurts us,” Patni said, noting that their home is near Ahmedabad’s airport flight path in Gujarat.

    Lindy Cameron, the British High Commissioner to India, paid homage at the crash site during the first anniversary. “Our house remains in the same spot, but we prefer not to stay here. The faces and memories haunt us,” she remarked.

    Nearby, a woman wept as she held a framed photo of her late relatives, while another family scattered rose petals amidst the ruins of the hostel in memory of their son.

    Relatives expected a conclusive report by Friday explaining the mishap. However, with investigations ongoing, only an interim report from the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) is anticipated.

    A preliminary report, issued a month after the crash, indicated that fuel supply to the engines was cut just before impact — raising suspicions of pilot error. It included a brief transcript of the captain and co-pilot discussing the fuel issue, which led to theories of pilot suicide.

    Criticism of the report was swift. It failed to clarify why the fuel switches were turned off, leaving unresolved whether it was a pilot’s mistake or a malfunction.

    Victims’ families are convening in Ahmedabad for a lawyer-organized conference with aviation safety experts and plan to hold a candlelight vigil after sunset.

    Nilesh Joshi, who traveled from London after attending an Indian wedding, spoke about the importance of the final report for closure. His wife, Kaminiben Nilesh Joshi, was killed in the crash. “It’s taking so long for authorities to assess what happened,” he said. “For those of us who lost loved ones, knowing the reason is crucial.”

    Only one passenger survived: British national Vishwash Kumar Ramesh, who bears significant psychological scars and persistent questions about the incident, including why it happened.

    Vijay Sengal, a sanitation inspector at a nearby hospital, vividly recalls the plane’s crash, describing the deafening noise. He was among the first responders to assist injured victims.

    “It was heartbreaking. When we tried to recover bodies, they wouldn’t come out. Instead, we’d find a hand or a foot,” Sengal explained. Now, many avoid the area after dark, fearing haunted spirits. “We believe in gods and spirits. Perhaps those passengers still have unresolved issues or unfulfilled last wishes,” he said.

  • Air India Grounds Boeing Dreamliner Over Fuel Switch Concern

    Air India Grounds Boeing Dreamliner Over Fuel Switch Concern

    Air India announced on Monday that it has temporarily grounded one of its Boeing Dreamliners after a pilot reported a potential issue with the aircraft’s fuel control switch—an investigation that is linked to a fatal crash from last year.

    The airline didn’t specify what type of defect was detected or provide any details about the specific flight involved. However, sources indicated that the pilot flagged the problem after the plane arrived in Bengaluru, India, following its departure from London.

    In response, Air India confirmed that the aircraft has been taken out of service and that the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) is being brought in to prioritize checkups based on the pilot’s concerns. The airline also stated that this issue has been communicated to India’s civil aviation authority.

    Neither Boeing nor the Indian civil aviation authority responded immediately to requests for comment.

    The carrier, part of the Tata Group and owned by Singapore Airlines, has been under heavy scrutiny since a Dreamliner crash in June of the previous year that resulted in 260 fatalities.

    Following last year’s incident, Air India carried out inspections on the fuel control switches across all Boeing 787 planes in its fleet, finding no problems.

    A cockpit voice recording from the June 12 flight suggested that the captain had shut off fuel flow to the engines—a detail that is part of the early analysis by U.S. officials, according to sources.

  • Air India Plane Skids on Landing in Mumbai, Damaging Runway

    Air India Plane Skids on Landing in Mumbai, Damaging Runway

    An Air India Airbus A320neo passenger plane lands at Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel International Airport in Ahmedabad, India, on October 22, 2021. — Reuters

    • Flight AI2744 arrived in Mumbai from Kochi, Kerala.
    • The airport reported “minor damage to the primary runway”.
    • Reports indicated that three tires on the aircraft burst upon landing.

    NEW DELHI: An Air India Airbus A320 flight went off the runway while landing at Mumbai International Airport during heavy rainfall on Monday, resulting in a temporary closure of the runway and some damage to one of the plane’s engines.

    All passengers and crew were safely evacuated, according to Air India, though they did not specify if there were any injuries. The flight, AI2744, had flown from Kochi in southern Kerala to Mumbai.

    The airport stated that there were “minor damages reported to the airport’s primary runway” following what they described as a “runway excursion,” and a secondary runway was activated to maintain airport operations.

    The aircraft has been grounded for inspection, as noted by Air India.

    A report from the Times of India cited sources claiming that three tires burst during landing. Footage from NDTV and India Today revealed visible damage to the outer casing of the engine, including some cracks.

    Air India is under heightened scrutiny after a tragic incident last month involving a Boeing 787 Dreamliner that crashed in Ahmedabad, claiming the lives of 260 individuals.

    Earlier this month, the European Union Aviation Safety Agency announced plans to investigate its budget airline, Air India Express, following reports from Reuters that the airline did not adhere to a directive requiring timely replacement of engine components on an Airbus A320 and had allegedly falsified records to indicate compliance.

  • India Directs Airlines to Inspect Fuel Switches on Boeing Jets

    India Directs Airlines to Inspect Fuel Switches on Boeing Jets

    Boeing Aircraft Fuel Switches to Be Inspected by Indian Airlines Following Fatal Crash

    NEW DELHI — Following the tragic crash of an Air India aircraft that resulted in 260 fatalities, the Indian government has mandated airlines to inspect fuel switches on various Boeing aircraft models.

    A preliminary investigation report, released by India’s Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau, revealed that the fuel switches had unexpectedly switched from the “run” position to “cutoff” shortly after takeoff.

    While the report did not assign blame for the disaster on June 12, it highlighted a concerning exchange between the two pilots; one questioned the other about the fuel cut-off, to which the second pilot insisted he had not done so.

    On Monday, the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) ordered an inspection of the locking mechanisms on fuel control switches across several Boeing models, such as the 737 and 787 series. This directive followed Boeing’s reassurance to operators regarding the safety of the fuel switch locks.

    The DGCA’s action aligns with recommendations from a Special Airworthiness Information Bulletin (SAIB) issued by the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), which suggested inspections to ensure that the locks cannot be unintentionally activated.

    Numerous domestic and international airlines have already initiated their own inspections of fuel switches in compliance with the SAIB directive. “We’ve noted that many operators, both local and abroad, have begun checking their aircraft fleets as per the SAIB,” stated the DGCA in an announcement.

    All airline operators are expected to complete these inspections on affected aircraft before July 21, as per DGCA’s statement.

    The Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner was en route from Ahmedabad to London when it tragically went down, claiming the lives of nearly all 242 passengers and crew on board, as well as 19 individuals on the ground.

    In a letter addressed to employees on Monday, Air India’s CEO Campbell Wilson acknowledged the ongoing investigation and cautioned against drawing “premature conclusions.”

  • Air India CEO: Ahmedabad Crash Probe Unveils New Questions

    Air India CEO: Ahmedabad Crash Probe Unveils New Questions

    A firefighter stands by the wreckage of an Air India Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner in Ahmedabad, India, on June 13, 2025. — Reuters

    • CEO notes that the report clarified some points but also raised new questions.
    • Wilson advises against hasty conclusions.
    • Memo states no findings regarding pilots’ health status.

    NEW DELHI: A preliminary inquiry into last month’s crash of an Air India passenger plane that resulted in 260 fatalities has produced further questions, indicating that the investigation is ongoing, according to a memo from the airline’s CEO.

    The preliminary report released by India’s Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau described a state of confusion in the cockpit just before the Boeing Dreamliner went down.

    In a memo shared with staff, Air India CEO Campbell Wilson remarked that the report has led to “new rounds of speculation in the media… It unsurprisingly brought some clarification while also raising additional questions.”

    He further stated, “The preliminary report did not identify a cause and made no recommendations, so I encourage everyone to refrain from drawing hasty conclusions as the investigation is far from complete.”

    The memo indicated that no mechanical or maintenance issues were found, and all required maintenance procedures had been adhered to.

    The Boeing 787 Dreamliner, which was en route to London from Ahmedabad, India, started to lose thrust and altitude shortly after takeoff. Tragically, all but one of the 242 individuals onboard, along with 19 others on the ground, lost their lives.

    The AAIB report highlighted that, during the flight’s final moments, one pilot was recorded inquiring about the other pilot’s decision to cut off the fuel supply.

    “The other pilot insisted that he did not do so,” the report noted, adding that the fuel cutoff switches for the plane’s engine two were activated almost simultaneously, although it did not specify how.

    The preliminary findings did not suggest any immediate actions for Boeing or GE, which supplied the engines for the aircraft.

    ALPA India, representing Indian pilots within the International Federation of Air Line Pilots’ Associations, has dismissed any assumptions of pilot error and called for a “fair and fact-based investigation.”

    “The pilots had successfully passed their mandatory pre-flight breathalyzer tests, and there were no concerns regarding their medical status,” Campbell emphasized in his memo.

    The captain of the Air India flight was Sumeet Sabharwal, 56, who logged a total of 15,638 flying hours and served as an instructor for Air India, according to the Indian government. His co-pilot was Clive Kunder, 32, with 3,403 flight hours to his credit.

    Air India is facing intensified scrutiny on multiple fronts following the crash.

    On July 4, the European Union Aviation Safety Agency announced an investigation into Air India Express, the budget arm of the airline, after a Reuters report revealed that the airline had delayed replacing engine components on an Airbus A320 as required and fabricated records to indicate compliance.

  • Pilot Groups Dismiss Human Error Claims in Air India Crash

    Pilot Groups Dismiss Human Error Claims in Air India Crash

    The wreckage of an Air India Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner lies on an open field in Ahmedabad, India on July 12, 2025. — Reuters

    • ICPA “profoundly troubled” by speculative claims.
    • Condemns insensitive allegations against individuals and families.
    • ALPA asserts that the investigation is leaning towards pilot culpability.

    NEW DELHI: Two prominent commercial pilots’ associations have dismissed assertions that human error led to an Air India crash that resulted in 260 fatalities, following a preliminary report revealing that the airplane’s engine fuel switches were turned off.

    Released on Saturday by India’s Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB), the report did not draw any conclusions or assign culpability for the June 12 tragedy. However, it did indicate that one pilot questioned the other about the cutoff of fuel, to which the second pilot replied that he had no knowledge of it.

    Further details about the cockpit conversation between the pilots were not disclosed.

    The Indian Commercial Pilots Association (ICPA) expressed being “profoundly troubled by speculative narratives,” particularly the “reckless and unfounded insinuation of pilot suicide.”

    “There is absolutely no basis for such a claim at this stage,” the ICPA stated in a release on Sunday, noting that such allegations are “profoundly insensitive to the individuals and families involved.”

    “To suggest pilot suicide casually, without verified evidence, is a severe breach of ethical journalism and undermines the dignity of the profession,” the statement continued.

    The initial findings from the investigation have led to speculation among independent aviation experts suggesting that either intentional or unintentional pilot actions might have contributed to the Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner crashing shortly after departing from Ahmedabad, located in western India.

    The ICPA referred to various aviation experts who indicated that engine fuel control switches can only be manipulated manually and intentionally.

    The Airline Pilots’ Association of India (ALPA India), another organization representing 800 pilots, criticized the investigation agency for maintaining “secrecy” throughout the inquiry, asserting that “suitably qualified personnel” were not included.

    “We believe the investigation is being guided by an assumption of the pilots’ culpability, and we strongly oppose this perspective,” ALPA India President Sam Thomas stated in a press release on Saturday.

    ALPA, which claims over 100,000 members globally, has also requested to the AAIB that they be allowed to participate as “observers” to enhance transparency in the investigation.

    The crash claimed the lives of all but one of the 242 people on board, as well as 19 individuals on the ground.

  • FAA and Boeing Confirm Safety of Fuel Switch Locks Amid Air India Probe

    FAA and Boeing Confirm Safety of Fuel Switch Locks Amid Air India Probe

    A firefighter stands beside the wreckage of an Air India Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner in Ahmedabad, India, on June 13, 2025.

    • Report on Air India crash highlights issues with engine fuel switches.
    • U.S. FAA claims that fuel switch locks pose no safety risks.
    • Boeing cites FAA notice and does not recommend further action, sources say.

    According to a private document obtained by Reuters, both the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and Boeing have issued statements that the fuel switch locks on Boeing aircraft are safe. This follows a preliminary report concerning the crash of Air India’s Boeing 787-8, which tragically resulted in the deaths of 260 individuals last month and raised concerns about the engine fuel cutoff switches.

    The FAA’s Continued Airworthiness Notification, dated July 11, communicated to civil aviation authorities emphasized: “While the design of the fuel control switch, particularly the locking feature, is consistent across various Boeing models, the FAA does not regard this as a safety issue that calls for an Airworthiness Directive for any Boeing aircraft, including the Model 787.”

    In response to inquiries, the FAA stated it has no additional comments beyond the issued notification.

    Boeing echoed the FAA’s notification in a Multi-Operator Message sent to airlines recently, indicating that the company does not recommend any changes, according to two insiders.

    The preliminary investigative report from India’s Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) referenced a 2018 FAA advisory. This advisory suggested, but did not require, operators of several Boeing aircraft models, including the 787, to check the locking mechanism of the fuel cutoff switches to ensure they could not be activated unintentionally.

    Air India reportedly did not perform the FAA-recommended inspections, citing that the advisory was non-mandatory. However, maintenance records revealed that the throttle control module, which encompasses the fuel switches, had been replaced in 2019 and again in 2023 on the aircraft involved in the accident.

    The report noted that “all applicable airworthiness directives and alert service bulletins were adhered to concerning the aircraft and its engines.”

    ALPA India, representing Indian pilots within the Montreal-based International Federation of Air Line Pilots’ Associations, publicly rejected the presumption of pilot error and called for a “fair, fact-based examination.”

    Sam Thomas, President of ALPA India, stated in an interview with Reuters that “the pilots’ association should now be included in the investigation process as observers.”

    In a letter shared on social media platform X, ALPA India referred to the preliminary investigation report that mentioned the 2018 FAA advisory “about the fuel control switch gates, suggesting possible equipment malfunction.”

    In the moments leading up to the crash, one pilot reportedly asked the other why the fuel had been cut off, to which the second pilot responded that he had not done so. The report indicated that fuel switches had nearly simultaneously transitioned from “run” to “cutoff” shortly after takeoff, yet it did not clarify how the switches could have changed position during the flight.

    Several safety experts from the U.S. supported ALPA India’s request for observer status in the investigation but indicated that the report did not imply bias towards pilot error.

    John Cox, a pilot and former representative of ALPA U.S., remarked that the AAIB’s report appeared to be objective and just.

  • Air India Crash Report Highlights Pilot’s Engine Switch Confusion

    Air India Crash Report Highlights Pilot’s Engine Switch Confusion

    A fire officer stands next to the wreckage of the Air India Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner in Ahmedabad, India, on June 13, 2025. — Reuters

    • The Boeing 787 crash resulted in the deaths of 260 individuals last month.
    • The pilots were experienced, but it’s unclear why the fuel switches activated.
    • One pilot questioned the other about shutting off the fuel.

    A preliminary report has revealed confusion in the cockpit moments before an Air India jetliner crashed, leading to 260 fatalities last month. The plane’s engine fuel cutoff switches appeared to have flipped almost simultaneously, cutting fuel to the engines.

    The Boeing 787 Dreamliner was on its way to London from Ahmedabad when it suddenly lost thrust and began to descend, according to Indian accident investigators who released their findings on Saturday—the deadliest aviation incident in a decade.

    This report from India’s Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) about the June 12 crash shortly after takeoff raises concerns over the positioning of the vital engine fuel cutoff switches, suggesting that neither Boeing nor the engine manufacturer GE was at fault.

    The crash poses a significant challenge for Tata Group as it seeks to enhance Air India’s image and modernize its fleet after acquiring the airline from the government in 2022.

    CCTV footage shows that shortly after takeoff, a backup energy device known as a ram air turbine deployed, indicating a loss of engine power.

    In the flight’s last moments, one pilot is heard asking the other why he had cut off the fuel, to which the co-pilot replied that he hadn’t done so, according to the report. The report did not specify which comments were made by the captain or the first officer, nor did it clarify who issued the “Mayday” call just prior to impact.

    The pilot in command was Sumeet Sabharwal, 56, with over 15,600 flight hours and known to have served as an instructor for Air India. His co-pilot, Clive Kunder, 32, had approximately 3,400 flight hours.

    The fuel switches were found to have flipped from ‘run’ to ‘cutoff’ just after takeoff. The preliminary report did not explain how this could have occurred during the flight.

    Aviation experts have raised doubts about the likelihood of a pilot unintentionally moving the fuel switches. “If they were moved by a pilot, the question is why?” questioned U.S. aviation safety expert Anthony Brickhouse.

    The report indicated that the switches were activated just a second apart, which aligns with the time it would take to toggle each one manually, as noted by aviation expert John Nance. He remarked that a pilot typically would never switch off the fuel during ascent.

    Activating the cutoff switch almost immediately halts the engines and is generally used to turn off engines once a plane has arrived at the gate or in specific emergencies, such as an engine fire. The report did not mention any emergency situation necessitating an engine shutdown.

    At the crash site, both fuel switches were discovered in the ‘run’ position, and there were indications that both engines relit before the crash at low altitude. The report was published at 1:30 AM IST on Saturday (8:00 PM GMT Friday).

    Air India has acknowledged the report in a statement, noting their cooperation with Indian authorities but refraining from further comments.

    The U.S. National Transportation Safety Board expressed gratitude to Indian officials for their collaboration and stated that no recommended actions were aimed at operators of Boeing 787s or GE engines based on the report.

    The U.S. Federal Aviation Administration emphasized its commitment to following the facts of the situation and addressing any identified risks promptly.

    Boeing stated that it would continue to support the investigation and its client, Air India. GE Aerospace has yet to respond to inquiries for comment.

    Investigation Developments

    The AAIB, part of India’s civil aviation ministry, is leading the investigation into the crash, which claimed nearly all 242 lives on board plus an additional 19 individuals on the ground.

    Most aviation accidents are attributed to multiple factors, with a preliminary report required within 30 days of the incident per international guidelines and a final report expected within a year.

    The aircraft’s black boxes, which include cockpit voice and flight data recorders, were retrieved shortly after the crash and later analyzed in India. These devices provide essential data such as altitude, airspeed, and final communications between pilots, which narrow down potential causes of the accident.

    Air India has faced heightened scrutiny following the crash.

    The European Union Aviation Safety Agency plans to investigate Air India Express, its budget airline, after reports emerged that the carrier failed to swiftly comply with directives to change engine components of an Airbus A320 and had falsified records to indicate adherence.

    India’s aviation regulatory body has also reprimanded Air India for violating rules regarding the operation of three Airbus aircraft with overdue escape slide checks, and in June, it was warned about “significant violations” related to pilot duty hours.

    India is optimistic about an aviation boom to fuel broader development goals, aiming to transform the country into a job-generating global aviation hub similar to Dubai, which currently manages a significant portion of its international traffic.

  • Air India Express Warned by Regulators Over Airbus Engine Delays

    Air India Express Warned by Regulators Over Airbus Engine Delays

    Air India Under Fire Following June Crash


    An Air India Airbus A321 takes flight at Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel International Airport in Ahmedabad, India, on June 17, 2025. — Reuters

    • Air India faces heightened scrutiny post-June crash.
    • Budget carrier criticized for delaying engine part replacements.
    • Airline reports corrective measures, including the suspension of a manager.

    India’s aviation regulatory authority issued a warning to Air India’s budget service in March for failing to quickly replace engine components on an Airbus A320 as mandated by the European Union’s aviation safety agency. The airline is also accused of manipulating records to claim compliance, as stated in a government memo.

    Air India Express acknowledged this misstep in a statement to Reuters, noting that they took “corrective action and preventive measures.”

    Since the tragic crash of a Boeing Dreamliner in Ahmedabad in June, which resulted in the deaths of 241 out of 242 people on board, Air India has been under significant scrutiny. This incident stands as the worst air disaster globally in a decade and is still being investigated.

    Concerns about the engine situation on the Air India Express Airbus were raised on March 18, well before the crash occurred. Moreover, this year, the parent company, Air India, has been warned for violating regulations related to flying three Airbus planes that had overdue checks on emergency slides, along with receiving a caution about “serious violations” regarding pilot duty hours.

    Air India Express operates as a subsidiary of Air India, which is part of the Tata Group. The airline has over 115 aircraft and services more than 50 destinations, operating around 500 flights daily.

    In 2023, the European Union Aviation Safety Agency issued an airworthiness directive concerning potential safety issues with CFM International LEAP-1A engines, requiring the replacement of specific components such as seals and rotating parts due to identified manufacturing defects.

    The directive stated, “If this issue is not addressed, it could lead to the failure of affected parts, potentially resulting in the release of high-energy debris that could damage the aircraft and impair its control.”

    A confidential memo from the Indian government to the airline, which Reuters obtained, indicated that surveillance by the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) found that the necessary modifications to the engine on an A320 were not completed “within the prescribed time frame.” The memo also noted, “To show compliance, records were apparently altered or forged,” referring to the Aircraft Maintenance and Engineering Operating System software airlines use to track maintenance.

    According to the memo, a mandatory modification was required for Air India Express’ aircraft, VT-ATD, which typically flies domestic routes as well as international flights to Dubai and Muscat, as per data from AirNav Radar.

    The oversight demonstrates that the responsible manager failed to maintain proper quality control, the memo explained.

    Air India Express informed Reuters that its technical team unfortunately missed the scheduled deadline for parts replacement due to an issue with the transition of records on its monitoring software, but quickly rectified the problem once identified.

    While the airline did not specify dates for compliance or address the DGCA’s allegations about record alterations, it did say that following the March memo, “necessary administrative actions” were taken, including the removal of the quality manager and the suspension of the deputy in charge of ongoing airworthiness.

    Neither the DGCA nor the European aviation agency responded to Reuters inquiries. Airbus and CFM International, a collaboration between General Electric and Safran, also declined to comment.

    This lapse was first noted during a DGCA audit in October 2024. The aircraft in question completed only a handful of flights after its deadline for replacing the CFM engine parts, as reported by a source with direct knowledge of the matter.

    “Such issues must be resolved immediately. It’s a serious oversight, especially when flying over water or near restricted airspace,” stated Vibhuti Singh, a former legal expert at India’s Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau.

    In February, the Indian government informed parliament that authorities had warned or fined airlines for safety violations on 23 occasions in the past year. Among those, three cases involved Air India Express and eight pertained to Air India.

  • India Plane Crash Inquiry Exploring Every Angle: Minister

    Fire officer stands near the crashed Air India Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner in Ahmedabad, India. — Reuters/File
    A fire officer stands beside the wreckage of an Air India Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner in Ahmedabad, India. — Reuters/File

    On Sunday, India’s aviation minister stated that investigators are examining “all possibilities” regarding the Air India crash, especially concerning sabotage.

    Out of the 242 individuals aboard the Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner, nearly all perished when it crashed in Ahmedabad on June 12.

    The authorities have also reported 19 fatalities on the ground. However, a police source indicated to AFP that the total death toll stands at 38.

    Murlidhar Mohol, the minister of state for civil aviation, mentioned during an interview with Indian news network NDTV that the investigation is considering “all angles,” particularly concerning potential sabotage.

    “It’s unprecedented for both engines to fail simultaneously,” Mohol added, referencing theories from experts regarding possible dual-engine failure.

    The minister emphasized that premature conclusions about the crash’s cause should be avoided until the investigative report is completed.

    This week, the investigation team began analyzing data from the cockpit voice recorder and flight data recorder to piece together the events leading up to the tragedy.

    Air India affirmed that the aircraft was “well-maintained” and indicated that the pilots were highly skilled.

    The plane’s black boxes—the cockpit voice recorder (CVR) and flight data recorder (FDR)—were recovered shortly after the crash, with one being found on a rooftop near the crash site on June 13 and the other in the debris on June 16, according to Reuters.

  • Indian Authorities Extract Black Box Data from Air India Crash

    Indian Authorities Extract Black Box Data from Air India Crash

    A police officer stands near the wreckage of an Air India aircraft that crashed during takeoff from Ahmedabad, India, en route to London’s Gatwick Airport on June 12, 2025. — Reuters

    • Data successfully retrieved from the black box.
    • Analysis of the CVR and FDR may unveil crucial details about the incident.
    • The investigation into the Air India crash is examining engine thrust.

    On Thursday, India’s civil aviation ministry announced that investigators have successfully downloaded flight recorder data from the tragic Air India crash this month, which resulted in the deaths of 260 individuals. This significant step is part of efforts to understand what is being termed the worst aviation disaster globally in the last decade.

    The Boeing 787 Dreamliner, headed for London, met with disaster shortly after departing from Ahmedabad, India, on June 12, claiming the lives of 241 out of 242 people on board and additional casualties on the ground.

    The aircraft’s black boxes, including the cockpit voice recorder (CVR) and flight data recorder (FDR), were retrieved shortly after the incident: one was found on a building’s rooftop on June 13 and the other from the wreckage on June 16.

    A team led by India’s Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB), along with officials from the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), accessed data from the CVR on Wednesday. The ministry stated, “These efforts are aimed at piecing together the sequence of events leading to the accident and identifying any contributing factors to improve aviation safety and prevent future occurrences.”

    Jennifer Homendy, chair of the NTSB, expressed hope that the Indian government would quickly share details from the crash investigation with the public. “For the sake of aviation safety and public awareness, we hope to see their findings released in a timely manner,” she commented during an aviation event on Thursday.

    Homendy pointed out that the NTSB team has been collaborating closely with the Indian authorities and AAIB, and she commended their cooperation.

    Sources indicate that the investigation, which began after the Air India plane started descending at an altitude of 650 feet, is looking closely at the engine’s thrust. Reports have emerged that investigators believe the Dreamliner had its emergency-power generator operational at the time of the crash.

    Typically, multiple factors contribute to air crashes, and a preliminary report is anticipated about 30 days following the accident.

    Boeing 787 aircraft are equipped with two GE recorders—one at the front and one at the rear—that capture the same flight data. General Electric, which provided the engines for the Air India plane, has dispatched experts to assist in the investigation. The forward recorder has a separate power supply that can provide backup power for approximately 10 minutes in the event of a loss of the plane’s main power source, according to a 2014 NTSB report.

    The decision to begin downloading the recorder’s data around two weeks post-accident has been seen as unusually delayed, especially since there was speculation that the black boxes might be sent to the U.S. for analysis.

    US aviation safety expert Anthony Brickhouse remarked that typically, countries acknowledge that the international community is watching closely and would be proactive about providing updates on the status of the recorders and initiating data downloads following such a high-profile crash.

    India has clarified that its actions in this investigation fully comply with both domestic and international regulations and has been conducted in a timely manner.

  • Identities Confirmed for 259 of 260 Air India Crash Victims

    Identities Confirmed for 259 of 260 Air India Crash Victims

    A fire officer stands next to the wreckage of an Air India Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner in Ahmedabad, India, on June 13, 2025.

    AHMEDABAD: On Tuesday, officials in Gujarat, India, announced they have identified all but one of the 260 bodies retrieved after an Air India plane crash this month in Ahmedabad.

    The Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner, carrying 242 individuals and heading to London’s Gatwick Airport, lost altitude mere seconds after taking off from Ahmedabad on June 12, crashing into a medical college dormitory and igniting into a fireball.

    There was a single survivor among the passengers, while the crash also claimed the lives of 19 individuals on the ground.

    The official death toll was slightly lower than previous estimates of 270, though authorities have opted to remain cautious in confirming the final count.

    “We have identified 259 victims so far, including 240 passengers and 19 non-passengers. We are still awaiting the DNA test results for one passenger,” stated Rakesh Joshi, superintendent of the Ahmedabad civil hospital.

    “Currently, the crash site is still under clearance operations. We cannot announce the final death count until we are certain that there are no more victims to be discovered,” he added.

    The remains of 256 victims have been returned to their families, according to a local government statement. Of these, 253 were identified via DNA matching, while the remaining six were identified through facial recognition.

    This announcement follows a recent warning issued to Air India by the government for “serious and repeated violations” concerning pilot duty schedules and oversight.

    The Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) ordered the removal of three Air India executives from crew scheduling roles due to lapses that led to flight durations exceeding the mandated maximum of 10 hours for pilots on flights from Bengaluru to London on May 16 and 17.

    The June 20 directive highlighted “systemic failures in scheduling protocols and oversight,” criticizing the lack of stringent disciplinary actions against the responsible parties.

    It’s worth noting that Air India was acquired by the Tata Group in 2022 and is facing significant challenges in revamping its reputation after years of criticism from travelers regarding subpar service.

  • India’s Regulator Cautions Air India Over Pilot Duty Violations

    India’s Regulator Cautions Air India Over Pilot Duty Violations

    An Air India Airbus A320-200 departs from Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel International Airport in Ahmedabad, India, on July 7, 2017. — Reuters

    • Three executives to be dismissed due to failures related to Bengaluru to London flights.
    • The June 20 directive mentions “systematic failures in scheduling protocols and oversights.”
    • Air India announces it has executed the directives from the civil aviation head.

    India’s aviation regulator has reprimanded Air India for “repeated and significant violations” concerning pilot duty roster management and oversight, as per government documents accessed by Reuters on Saturday.

    The Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) instructed Air India to dismiss three executives responsible for crew scheduling: a divisional vice president, a chief manager of crew scheduling, and a planning executive. These actions were prompted by incidents involving flights from Bengaluru to London on May 16 and 17, which exceeded the maximum pilot flight time limit of 10 hours.

    The June 20 directive highlighted “systemic failures in scheduling protocols and oversights” and criticized the lack of strict disciplinary actions against those accountable.

    This latest enforcement by the aviation authority occurs separately from the tragic crash earlier this month involving an Air India Boeing 787-8, which resulted in the loss of all but one of the 242 individuals onboard. However, it reflects an increased scrutiny of the airline.

    On Thursday, Reuters reported that the authorities also cautioned Air India for violating safety regulations after three of its Airbus aircraft flew while overdue for checks on emergency escape slide equipment.

    In comments provided to Reuters, Air India affirmed that it has adhered to the DGCA’s directives and stated that the chief operations officer will now directly oversee the Integrated Operations Control Centre.

    “Air India is dedicated to ensuring full compliance with safety protocols and standards,” the airline added.

    The DGCA’s order noted that Air India voluntarily acknowledged the violations.

    After being acquired by the Tata Group in 2022, Air India confronts substantial challenges as it seeks to improve its reputation following years of customer criticism regarding service quality.

    Indian regulators, similar to those in other countries, often impose fines on airlines for compliance failures. In February, the government disclosed to Parliament that 23 instances of safety violations were reported last year, with approximately half—12 instances—pertaining to Air India and its subsidiary, Air India Express. The largest fine issued was $127,000 to Air India for having “insufficient oxygen on board” on certain international flights.

  • Air India Faces Warning for Flying Airbus with Unchecked Slides

    Air India Faces Warning for Flying Airbus with Unchecked Slides

    Sure! Here’s a rewritten version of the provided content in American English, ensuring it’s unique and free from plagiarism:

    —

    A woman stands beside the Air India Airbus A350 at the Wings India 2024 aviation event at Begumpet Airport, Hyderabad, India, on January 18, 2024. —Reuters

    • Regulatory body cautions Air India regarding overdue inspections on three aircraft.
    • Inspections revealed unverified emergency supplies on the aircraft, according to the regulator.
    • Some Air India planes were found to have outdated registration documents.

    India’s aviation regulatory authority has issued a warning to Air India for violating safety standards after three of its Airbus aircraft flew despite missing mandatory emergency equipment inspections. These findings were outlined in official documents reviewed by Reuters.

    The warnings and the investigation report were unrelated to last week’s crash of an Air India Boeing 787-8, which resulted in the deaths of all but one of the 242 individuals aboard the flight. The warnings were sent only a few days before this tragic incident occurred.

    According to the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA), surprise inspections conducted in May revealed that three Air India Airbus planes were still operational despite overdue inspections on critical emergency gear, specifically escape slides.

    In at least one instance, the inspection of an Airbus A320 was postponed for over a month, ultimately occurring on May 15. Radar data from AirNav indicates that during this delay, the aircraft was flown to international destinations including Dubai, Riyadh, and Jeddah.

    Another Airbus A319 used for domestic flights was discovered to be over three months overdue for its checks, while a third aircraft’s inspection missed its deadline by two days.

    “These instances highlight that these aircraft were operated with expired or unverified emergency equipment, which contravenes established airworthiness and safety standards,” stated the DGCA report.

    Air India “failed to respond promptly” to the deficiencies identified by the DGCA, indicating significant flaws in their procedures and oversight, the report continued.

    Since its acquisition by the Tata Group in 2022, Air India announced that it is “accelerating” the verification of all its maintenance records, particularly concerning the escape slides, and plans to complete the process shortly.

    In one case, the issue was highlighted when an engineer from AI Engineering Services “accidentally deployed an escape slide during maintenance,” the company advised.

    Neither the DGCA nor Airbus provided comments in response to Reuters’ inquiries.

    Vibhuti Singh, a former legal expert at the government’s Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau, emphasized the seriousness of these slide checks, stating, “In the event of an accident, failure to open could result in severe injuries.”

    The DGCA noted that certificates of airworthiness for any aircraft that misses mandatory inspections are considered “suspended.”

    The warnings and report were sent by Animesh Garg, a deputy director of airworthiness in the Indian government, to Air India’s CEO Campbell Wilson as well as the airline’s continuing airworthiness manager, quality manager, and head of planning.

    An aviation lawyer in India mentioned that such breaches generally attract both financial and civil penalties for both the airline and its executives.

    Last year, Wilson mentioned to Reuters that global shortages of parts have impacted most airlines, but the effect has been felt more acutely by Air India due to its aging fleet, many of which haven’t been updated since they were delivered in 2010-2011.

    Systemic Issues Identified

    Like many global regulators, the Indian aviation authority frequently fines airlines for compliance violations. In February, the country’s junior aviation minister informed parliament that airlines had been warned or fined 23 times for safety infractions in the previous year. Around half of these instances—12—concerned Air India and Air India Express, including one incident involving “unauthorized cockpit access.” The largest penalty was a fine of $127,000 against Air India for “insufficient oxygen on board” a flight to San Francisco.

    The recent crash, the investigation into which is ongoing, poses additional challenges for Air India as it seeks to improve its reputation, which has faced criticism from travelers for inadequate service for many years.

    Air India’s Chairman, N. Chandrasekaran, informed staff that the incident should serve as a wake-up call to enhance the safety of the airline, urging them to remain steadfast despite the criticism.

    The DGCA’s report also pointed out that numerous Air India aircraft inspected had outdated registration paperwork. Air India responded to Reuters, claiming that all but one of its aircraft were compliant and insisted that this did not affect safety.

    The DGCA investigation criticized the airline for “insufficient internal oversight,” stating, “Despite previous warnings and identified issues, the organization’s internal quality and planning departments failed to take effective corrective actions, indicating a failure in systemic controls.”

    —

    This text maintains the original message while using unique phrasing and American English conventions.