الوسم: War

  • Trump’s Approval Hits 33% as US Support for Iran War Wavers

    Trump’s Approval Hits 33% as US Support for Iran War Wavers

    A recent poll indicates that only 31% of Americans currently support military action by the United States against Iran. Support among Republicans has declined to 69% from 77% in March. Additionally, a significant 83% of the population believes that any conflict with Iran will persist for a prolonged period.

    WASHINGTON — According to a recent Reuters/Ipsos survey concluding on Monday, public backing for the ongoing conflict with Iran has dipped to its lowest point since the war’s early days. The survey shows only 31% of Americans favor U.S. military intervention against Iran, a decrease from 37% recorded in a March poll and 34% earlier this month. The decline is primarily due to a drop in Republican support, with 69% now in favor compared to 77% in March.

    The prolonged conflict has continued to impact President Donald Trump’s approval ratings, with only 33% expressing approval of his performance — the lowest in the polling data from his first and second terms. Trump has justified the military actions that began with U.S.-Israeli strikes on Iran on February 28, asserting that preventing Tehran from developing nuclear weapons is essential. While combat has cooled somewhat in recent months, Iran maintains a de facto blockade affecting regional oil exports, contributing to near-record high gasoline prices in the U.S.

    Despite efforts to escalate economic sanctions, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent indicated on Monday that expanding penalties against countries trading with Iran is under consideration, though no new sanctions have been imposed yet. This highlights the administration’s ongoing struggle with the complexities of the conflict.

    Fears of an extended war are widespread, with 83% of Americans believing the conflict will endure for a considerable duration, up from 80% earlier this month. As the 2024 Presidential election approaches, Trump has campaigned on promises to control inflation and avoid protracted military conflicts. However, six months into the Iran crisis, U.S. gasoline prices have risen over a dollar per gallon compared to pre-war levels. This economic strain is affecting Trump’s Republican allies, who will be defending narrow congressional majorities in the upcoming midterm elections on November 3.

    In terms of voting preferences, independent voters favor Democrats over Republicans by a 33% to 19% margin when asked whom they would support in a congressional vote if elections were held today.

    The survey included 1,215 adults nationwide and carries a margin of error of approximately 3 percentage points in either direction.

  • US and Iran Maintain Hostile Rhetoric Before New Sanctions

    US Navy sailors work on the flight deck of the aircraft carrier USS George Washington as it transits the Arabian Sea to support US military operations in the war with Iran August 20, 2026. — Reuters
    US Navy sailors work on the flight deck of the aircraft carrier USS George Washington as it transits the Arabian Sea to support US military operations in the war with Iran August 20, 2026. — Reuters

    • US to target Iranian trading partners, raising concerns in China.
    • Strait of Hormuz traffic drops sharply, and oil prices continue climbing.
    • Iran allows Iraqi oil tankers to pass through Hormuz.

    Tensions rose between the United States and Iran ahead of Monday’s announcement of new U.S. economic sanctions that could significantly impact Iran and its key trading partners, including China.

    As the war reaches its six-month mark, both sides are avoiding open conflict but have not entered peace negotiations. Meanwhile, oil shipments through the Strait of Hormuz have nearly halted, with Tehran warning it would strike any unauthorized oil tankers attempting to cross the narrow waterway.

    U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent is scheduled to hold a press conference at 2:00 p.m. local time on Monday, promising to unveil “the toughest sanctions in history” against Iran while urging China to cooperate with Washington. Notably, China imported over 80% of Iran’s exported oil in 2025, according to analytics firm Kpler. Beijing continues to call for diplomatic solutions.

    Iran’s Foreign Ministry spokesperson, Esmaeil Baghaei, stated on Saturday that the upcoming U.S. sanctions represented “an assertion of extraterritorial sovereignty over every independent member state of the United Nations.”

    “Such secondary sanctions lack any legal foundation in international law,” he declared via X (formerly Twitter).

    President Donald Trump, who has warned countries against providing “any form of support” to Iran, commented on Friday that the U.S. was monitoring the situation closely.

    “They want to make a deal, but in my view, they’re not ready for the right deal,” Trump said, referring to Iran.

    Hormuz traffic halted

    While the U.S. has effectively blockaded Iranian ships from their ports, the Strait of Hormuz remains mostly closed, with thousands of sailors stranded aboard hundreds of ships. Data shows that only four vessels, none of them large crude carriers or liquefied natural gas tankers, made their way through the strait on Thursday.

    However, Iran has granted passage to several Iraqi oil tankers after repeated requests from Baghdad, according to state news agency IRNA.

    IRNA reported that securing special permissions for Iraqi tankers was a key part of Iraqi Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf’s visit to Iran.

    U.S. Energy Secretary Chris Wright noted that U.S. military assistance has facilitated an average of 8 million barrels of oil passing through the Strait daily—down from more than 20 million barrels per day before the conflict, which accounts for roughly one-fifth of global oil consumption.

    Despite severe setbacks to Iran’s economy, navy, and air force from American attacks, Tehran still possesses enough missile and drone capabilities to disrupt oil tanker traffic and target regional adversaries.

    Trump has so far failed to achieve initial goals such as dismantling Iran’s nuclear program (which remains uncertain since UN inspectors have been barred since 2025) or creating circumstances for Iranians to overthrow their clerical regime.

    The conflict has resulted in significant casualties, including the death of 168 Iranian schoolchildren on the war’s first day. The U.S. has reported over 750 military personnel wounded and 18 fatalities.

    Iranian economy under strain

    Major General Ali Abdollahi, Iran’s armed forces chief of staff, vowed on Friday that Iran would respond militarily to threats with “crushing, punishing, and devastating” retaliations.

    Still, President Masoud Pezeshkian has called for diplomatic solutions.

    “It would be better to end this war today, when we are strong and dignified, with the whole world recognizing our victory and condemning America’s unlawful attacks on our schools, hospitals, and infrastructure,” Pezeshkian said, according to ISNA.

    Iran’s parliamentary speaker and chief negotiator with the U.S., Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, acknowledged the economic hardships late Thursday in conversations with Iranian and Iraqi businesspeople.

    “No matter our military strength, we cannot survive if our people are hungry or if we lack economic growth, local production, and financial stability,” Ghalibaf stated, as reported by IRNA.

  • Gaza Zoo Animals Suffer Amid War’s Devastation

    Gaza Zoo Animals Suffer Amid War’s Devastation

    When children arrive at the zoo near Gaza’s Nuseirat refugee camp, they often see a lion staring vaguely through the bars and chimpanzees sitting listlessly in their enclosure. Many animals are undernourished and weakened due to shortages of food, medicine, and vaccines, yet they persist, largely thanks to the efforts of zoo owner Mahmoud Gomaa.

    Originally, Gomaa operated the zoo in Rafah, a southern city, but he was forced to flee when Israeli troops attacked and took control of parts of the area in 2024. As the conflict intensified, he relocated the surviving animals from one town to another before settling in Nuseirat in central Gaza earlier this year.

    In Gaza, Gomaa reopened the zoo with hopes of providing some relief for traumatized children after nearly three years of destruction. He shared that at the start of the war, his priority was to save the animals, even more than himself, as the struggle for survival engulfed everyone.

    Prior to the outbreak of conflict between Israel and Hamas, Gaza boasted a number of zoos showcasing exotic and wild animals like lions and eagles, according to municipal records. Now, maintaining such facilities faces enormous obstacles, especially in sourcing sufficient food for the animals amid a strained food supply for the human population.

    Veterinarian Nidal Fadel explained that animals are being fed frozen meat, which is harmful because they naturally hunt fresh prey: “This is a catastrophe and a poor nutritional plan.” The war has taken a direct toll on the animals, with Gomaa recalling leaving behind lions, crocodiles, and ostriches when he fled Rafah. When he returned months later, only bones remained of the crocodiles and ostriches, and the lions were gone.

    The trauma inflicted by the sounds and sights of ongoing conflict profoundly impacts the animals. Veterinarian Amir Khalil, who has organized rescue missions into Gaza, noted that lions are particularly sensitive, detecting sounds and disturbances humans often miss. “Constant bombing and conflict create tremendous stress and fear for them,” Khalil said.

    Inside the zoo in Nuseirat, the solitary lion barely acknowledged visitors, but children found joy in interacting with other animals—parrots perched on shoulders and smaller monkeys that they could pet. Despite the ongoing hostilities and a fragile ceasefire, the zoo provides a rare spot of respite, although Israel’s military, claiming its strikes target Hamas, hasn’t responded to inquiries about civilian infrastructure like zoos and their animals.

    Karam Al-Mazin, a 42-year-old visitor, lamented the current situation: “Today, there’s no place for children to play. All that’s left are rubble, stones, and tents. The kids are bored and going through a tough time.”

  • Cairo Talks Challenge Trump’s Gaza Peace Plan Amid Renewed Israeli Airstrikes

    Cairo Talks Challenge Trump’s Gaza Peace Plan Amid Renewed Israeli Airstrikes

    Palestinians walk past the rubble of residential buildings destroyed during the conflict in Gaza City, August 15, 2026.— Reuters

    – Trump’s proposal calls for an immediate halt to military operations in Gaza.
    – Envoys are set to meet with Netanyahu on Monday, according to an Israeli official.
    – Israel claims it targeted militants in its recent Gaza strikes.

    Donald Trump’s representatives met with mediators from Egypt, Qatar, and Turkey in Cairo on Sunday, an anonymous diplomatic source revealed. The goal was to push forward with the U.S. president’s peace initiative for Gaza, despite ongoing Israeli airstrikes in the region.

    Hamas officials attended some of the talks that Trump’s envoy and his son-in-law, Jared Kushner, as well as Nickolay Mladenov—Trump’s representative for Gaza—conducted with mediators.

    An Israeli official stated that Kushner and Mladenov were scheduled to meet with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Monday. Netanyahu had previously dismissed Trump’s recent peace plan for Gaza as “unacceptable” on August 9.

    The Israeli source expressed concerns over Washington’s insistence on ending targeted killings of Hamas fighters, as the group works to rebuild its strength.

    Trump’s peace proposal demands an immediate end to hostilities in Gaza, envisioning Hamas disarming as Israeli forces withdraw and Gaza undergoes reconstruction under a new civilian Palestinian government.

    Israel has resumed airstrikes after a brief reduction earlier this month. The military reported hitting two militants from Islamic Jihad and Hamas in Khan Younis and Nuseirat, injuring at least five Palestinians in the process. Medics noted that one of the wounded in Khan Younis later died from their injuries.

    Another strike targeted a different fighter, hitting an apartment in Nuseirat in central Gaza and wounding several individuals, according to medical personnel.

    Earlier, Hamas leader Khalil Al-Hayya met with Egypt’s intelligence chief, Hassan Rashad, in Cairo. Hamas spokesperson Hazem Qassem mentioned that Al-Hayya would update mediators on alleged violations of the ceasefire by Israel.

    Last month, Trump announced a major breakthrough in his effort to end the conflict. Hamas indicated it had agreed to the peace plan to avoid further fighting but emphasized that Israel must first meet its commitments by withdrawing its forces and ceasing attacks.

    Five Arab nations along with Turkey, Pakistan, and Indonesia condemned Israel’s rejection of the plan. In a joint statement issued Sunday, they warned that this move jeopardizes Trump’s peace efforts.

    Netanyahu’s Likud party, which faces tough polls ahead of the October 27 national election, claimed that Arab countries aim to topple Netanyahu so that his political opponents can “give them everything they want.”

    Hamas also called on mediators and the Peace Board—established under Trump’s plan—to pressure Israel into fulfilling its initial obligations, ending ceasefire violations, and approving the next phase of the roadmap.

    A ceasefire in October halted the intense two-year conflict that began after Hamas launched an attack on Israel on October 7, 2023. However, the ceasefire failed to stop all Israeli attacks entirely.

    Since October 2025, Israeli forces have killed over 1,250 Palestinians in Gaza, most of whom were civilians. The exact number of militants among the dead remains unclear, as Hamas typically does not disclose such details. Meanwhile, four Israeli soldiers have been killed by Gaza-based fighters during the same period, according to Israeli reports.

  • Syria sentences Bashar al-Assad to death over killings and torture

    Syria sentences Bashar al-Assad to death over killings and torture

    A Syrian court has handed down its first conviction against Bashar al-Assad. The court sentenced Assad to death in absentia, citing charges of murder, torture, and arbitrary detention during nearly 14 years of conflict in Syria. A security official associated with Assad was also sentenced to death.

    Assad, born in 1965, assumed power in 2000 following the death of his father, Hafez al-Assad. His leadership maintained the family’s grip on power, reinforced by the Alawite sect’s dominance in the predominantly Sunni Muslim nation, and upheld Syria’s alliances with Iran, along with its opposition to Israel and the United States.

    He was forced to leave Damascus nearly two years ago when rebel forces advanced toward the city. He is now residing in Moscow.

    Tuesday’s trial involved former government officials and resulted in a death verdict for Assad over crimes including premeditated murder—especially of children—torture, arbitrary arrests, and crimes against humanity.

    This marks the first legal action taken against Assad, who led Syria for more than two decades before being ousted following a rebel offensive in December 2024 that ended his family’s longstanding rule and ignited a brutal civil war, killing hundreds of thousands of Syrians.

    Assad’s early rule was shaped by regional turmoil, including the Iraq war and Lebanon crisis, but it was the outbreak of civil war after the 2011 Arab Spring protests demanding democracy that defined his presidency. The conflict swiftly turned deadly as government forces responded with lethal force to protests demanding change.

  • US Launches Nearly All Long-Range Missiles During Middle East Conflict, Sources Say

    US Launches Nearly All Long-Range Missiles During Middle East Conflict, Sources Say

    The US Army has depleted a large portion of its stockpile of highly precise long-range missiles during its five-month conflict with Iran, according to three individuals familiar with the data. This raises concerns about the military’s readiness for future engagements.

    Primarily, these missiles are surface-to-surface weapons, including Army Tactical Missile Systems (ATACMS) and Precision Strike Missiles (PrSM). Two sources indicated that the U.S. has almost entirely used these weapons.

    The extent of the depletion of ATACMS and PrSM missiles has not been publicly disclosed before. These long-range munitions, each costing over $1 million, are crucial for precise strikes from a safe distance. ATACMS have been instrumental in Ukraine’s efforts, enabling Kyiv to target locations within Russia. The newer PrSM system is designed to replace the shorter-range ATACMS with a more advanced technology.

    The significant use of these missiles suggests that President Donald Trump might have to resort to more dangerous options, such as piloted bombing missions, if large-scale attacks on Iran are renewed. The exact remaining quantities of each missile are confidential.

    Initially, Trump launched the Iran confrontation in February in coordination with Israel, expecting the conflict to be brief. However, as the fighting persists, worried officials believe the dwindling missile reserves could limit U.S. options to deter adversaries like Russia and China.

    One official mentioned that while Central Command — overseeing U.S. forces in the Middle East — has nearly exhausted its land-based missile supplies, it has been able to restock from U.S. military stockpiles elsewhere globally. The sources spoke on condition of anonymity.

    In response to inquiries, the White House quoted Trump, stating that the U.S. possesses “far more munitions than anyone in the world” and “far more than we need.” Trump also claimed that defense manufacturers are currently producing more munitions than ever before, expanding production capacities.

    Experts agree that certain munitions, such as artillery shells and various missiles, are being produced at record levels. Still, there are concerns that supplies might fall short if the conflict prolongs.

    Lockheed Martin, which manufactures ATACMS, PrSMs, and the THAAD missile defense system, did not immediately comment on the stockpile status or Trump’s claims. Raytheon, producer of Tomahawk cruise missiles and Patriot interceptors, also declined to respond promptly.

    Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell emphasized the strength of the U.S. military, affirming that it has all necessary resources to execute commands and has carried out successful operations. He stressed that the U.S. maintains a robust arsenal to safeguard its interests.

    Current supply figures have circulated within the government amid tense internal discussions about how much longer the U.S. can sustain strikes against Iran without depleting stockpiles to levels that would hinder responses elsewhere.

    One official noted that the reduction in ATACMS and PrSMs results from a conscious decision by the Trump administration to avoid riskier tactics, such as using piloted aircraft for bombing. These long-distance weapons are valuable against enemies with strong air defenses, like China, and have already been used inside Iran, according to a March report by the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS).

    The report stated that PrSM stocks were initially low because the system is relatively new, though the military plans to order significant quantities for 2027. The military has said ATACMS are being phased out as production shifts toward PrSMs.

    Military leaders have warned the president for weeks about declining stocks of defensive systems like Patriot interceptors and THAAD missiles, which are among the most effective in the U.S. arsenal. Last week, some media reported that Trump decided not to launch another major offensive in Iran, partly due to warnings about depleted stockpiles. A U.S. official disputes this, claiming that the decision was influenced by pressure from Gulf allies.

    The conflict in the Middle East has sparked debates about whether Trump has the authority to extend hostilities against Iran without congressional approval, as no formal war declaration or authorization has been submitted.

    Last week, CSIS estimated that from February to July, about 65% of Patriot interceptors had been spent, and the number of THAAD interceptors had decreased by at least 38% since the conflict’s start. These systems are essential for defending against ballistic missile threats.

    While Reuters has not verified these figures independently, two sources confirmed that the data align with internal U.S. assessments. The U.S. also used nearly half of its global stock of Tomahawk cruise missiles, typically launched from naval vessels, since the war began.

    Raytheon has reached a tentative multi-year agreement with the Pentagon to ramp up Tomahawk production and replenish stockpiles across other munitions.

  • Trump’s Fluctuating Stance on Iran: His Own Words

    Trump’s Fluctuating Stance on Iran: His Own Words

    Donald Trump has issued some of the most aggressive public threats regarding military action in recent U.S. history, though he has also retracted many of those statements. The 80-year-old Republican’s tone on Iran has changed multiple times since the conflict there began on February 28, often shifting sharply and quickly.

    He has claimed victory repeatedly, asserting that Iran’s military strength was completely defeated, only to later amend the timeline or threaten Tehran with additional strikes. On June 17, Trump praised Iran’s new leaders as “very smart” and “less radicalized” than those who had been killed in U.S. and Israeli attacks. By July 8, however, his tone grew harsher. “I don’t want to deal with them anymore; they’re scum,” he stated.

    Here are some notable examples of Trump’s threats toward Iran and how he later softened his stance:

    March 21:
    “Iran must fully open, without threats, the Strait of Hormuz within 48 hours. If not, the U.S. will target and destroy their power plants, starting with the largest!”
    This warning, broadcast on his Truth Social platform, was alarming because attacking civilian infrastructure like power plants is widely regarded as a war crime.

    March 23:
    Two days later, Trump extended the deadline by five days, citing “productive conversations” with Iran. He then postponed further destruction of energy facilities for ten days, moving the deadline to April 6, to allow ongoing diplomatic negotiations.

    April 5:
    Approaching the end of the extension, Trump posted a profanity-laden message on Easter Sunday, threatening Iran by saying, “Open the damn Strait, or you’ll be living in Hell,” concluding with “Praise be to Allah.”

    April 7:
    Trump declared, “An entire civilization will die tonight,” which many interpreted as a threat to obliterate Iran and its roughly 90 million people. Later that day, he announced a temporary suspension of attacks: “I agree to hold off bombing Iran for two weeks” after discussions with Pakistani leaders.

    June 11:
    Trump warned on social media: “The U.S. will hit Iran very hard tonight,” and mentioned plans to seize Kharg Island along with other oil infrastructure. However, five hours later, he canceled the strikes, attributing the decision to progress with negotiations aimed at ending the hostilities.

    An interim agreement was signed in June, but within a month, tensions rose again—Iran targeted U.S. facilities across the Middle East, and U.S. forces responded by attacking Iranian coastal defenses, along with bridges and infrastructure.

    July 31:
    “Iran will face severe measures soon; at some point, they’ll realize they can’t endure it anymore,” Trump told his cabinet.

    August 1:
    Trump claimed Iran and regional neighbors requested the U.S. to hold off on attacking, stating “a deal has been agreed upon,” though Iranian state media strongly denied making such a request.

  • Netanyahu and Trump Hold First White House Meeting Amid Iran Conflict

    Netanyahu and Trump Hold First White House Meeting Amid Iran Conflict

    Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu made his first face-to-face visit to the White House since the Iran conflict erupted, engaging in discussions with President Donald Trump. The United States military confirmed they had intercepted several missiles fired by Tehran. The private meeting, described as “positive and productive” by the White House, lasted approximately an hour and a half. It aimed to mend public differences regarding the war and reinforce their alliance.

    Following the meeting, Netanyahu expressed in a video message that it was “one of the best conversations I’ve ever had with the president of the United States” and emphasized their mutual goal: preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. The Iran conflict, which started in late February with joint US-Israeli strikes, has recently paused, with Washington indicating a preference to see diplomatic negotiations proceed.

    Yemen’s Iran-supported Houthi rebels claimed responsibility for ballistic missile attacks against a Saudi oil tanker, NCC Ghazal, in the Red Sea, accusing it of violating a blockade they imposed on the kingdom’s ports. Saudi Arabia has not yet responded publicly but reported intercepting drones targeting eastern oil facilities, blaming Iran-backed militias in Iraq.

    The U.S. Central Command announced that Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps launched multiple ballistic missiles from Iran aimed at U.S. forces in the Middle East, all of which were successfully intercepted. Tensions had been simmering, with nightly U.S. strikes on Iran and missile and drone attacks from Tehran on U.S. allies around the Gulf, though both the U.S. and Iran had temporarily held fire over the weekend.

    Israel has not participated in the recent hostilities between the U.S. and Iran, which escalated earlier this month after a ceasefire broke down. This was the eighth meeting between Netanyahu and Trump since early 2025, taking place ahead of crucial elections in both Israel and the United States—national elections for Netanyahu and midterms for Trump.

    Netanyahu attended a private memorial dinner in Washington honoring the late Senator Lindsey Graham and also participated in a memorial service for the late Israeli ally. Relations between Trump and Netanyahu were strained during last month’s negotiations over Iran’s ceasefire, with Trump criticizing Netanyahu harshly. Trump later referred to Netanyahu as a “very difficult guy” in an interview. Netanyahu minimized these disagreements, calling them “tactical differences” and reaffirming their shared objectives in the conflict.

    On the agenda for Tuesday’s discussions were the implementation of a US-backed framework agreement signed by Israel and Lebanon last month, though ground-level application remains challenging. They also planned to address the ongoing crisis in Gaza, where reconstruction efforts have stalled, and the humanitarian situation remains bleak. Israel continues its frequent targeting of militants in Gaza, nearly three years after the outbreak of hostilities with Hamas.

    Israeli UN ambassador Danny Danon highlighted the timing of Netanyahu’s visit, stressing the ongoing threats from Iran, which continues to support terrorism and block the Strait of Hormuz. International relations expert Yonatan Freeman explained that the main goal was to demonstrate that the U.S. and Israel remain aligned, countering any notions of a falling-out or major disagreements between the allies.

  • Only One-Third of Americans Support Iran War, Uncertain About Trump’s Aims: Poll

    Only One-Third of Americans Support Iran War, Uncertain About Trump’s Aims: Poll

    A recent Reuters/Ipsos poll shows that only one in three Americans support the ongoing war with Iran—the lowest level of support since the conflict began five months ago. Most respondents believe President Donald Trump has failed to clearly communicate his objectives. The survey, conducted from Friday through Sunday, reveals a slight increase in Trump’s approval rating to 37%, up three points from last month, which marked his lowest approval during his presidency.

    Support for the conflict remains fragile, with only about a third of Americans backing the war effort. Trump has provided inconsistent explanations for the conflict, including claims that it aims to help Iranians overthrow their government, disable Iran’s ballistic missile programs, and prevent it from developing nuclear weapons. Despite these statements, 69% of Americans—including 40% of Republicans—agree that Trump has not effectively communicated the goals of US military involvement in Iran.

    Olivia Wales, a White House spokesperson, emphasized that Trump will not alter his decisions based on fluctuating polls and reaffirmed his commitment to preventing Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon. “What’s most important to Americans is having a leader who takes decisive action to keep them safe,” she said.

    Since the US and Israel launched strikes on February 28, public approval for the war has consistently remained below 40%. This contrasts sharply with the early support seen during previous conflicts, such as the Iraq War from 2003 to 2011, when about 70% of Americans supported the military intervention, and during the initial days of the Afghanistan War from 2001 to 2021, with backing reaching 90%.

    The disapproval of the ongoing war is impacting Trump and the Republican Party as they head into the midterm elections in November. Many Americans remain unsure about why the US engaged in the conflict; for instance, Alex Womack, a retired turbine repair technician from Stockbridge, Georgia, and a former Marine who supported George H.W. Bush during the Gulf War, admits he has no idea why the US started this war. His support for Trump has waned due to the conflict, and he now feels Trump isn’t handling it well.

    To this point, 18 American soldiers have lost their lives in the fight, while thousands have died in Iran and Lebanon, where Iran-backed fighters oppose Israeli forces. The war has also spiked gasoline prices, a financial burden for many Americans, with the national average exceeding $4 per gallon—up from about $3 before the conflict began.

    Political strategist Alex Conant points out that this economic pressure complicates the White House’s messaging, as officials have been emphasizing economic arguments since January. However, these efforts become difficult amid the ongoing focus on foreign policy issues.

    In the latest survey, independent voters favor Democratic congressional candidates over Republicans by 36% to 20% and also prefer Democrats on economic policies.

    Former President Trump has campaigned on avoiding prolonged wars, initially estimating the Iran conflict would last about four to five weeks. He has also criticized comparisons to longer conflicts like Vietnam, which resulted in over 58,000 American deaths over two decades. Independent voter Rhyan Anderson from Georgia, who supported Trump in 2024 but voted for Biden in 2020, suggests Trump should prioritize domestic issues rather than aid Israel or other allies.

    Since mid-March, the poll shows American support for military strikes on Iran at around 37%, compared to 27% support on the day the war started, with roughly 29% undecided. The survey, conducted online among 1,246 adults nationwide, carries a margin of error of plus or minus 3 percentage points.

  • Trump Declares Iran’s Interim Deal ‘Over’ Following Strikes

    Trump Declares Iran’s Interim Deal ‘Over’ Following Strikes

    U.S. President Donald Trump attends a meeting of the North Atlantic Council (NAC) during the NATO leaders’ summit in Ankara, Turkey, on July 8, 2026. — Reuters

    • Trump states, “No intention to negotiate” with Iranians.
    • Iran’s lead negotiator claims the era of U.S. “bullying” is over.
    • More than 60 IRGC boats targeted, according to Central Command.

    On Wednesday, U.S. President Donald Trump declared that a temporary agreement aimed at ending hostilities with Iran has been terminated after Iran launched new attacks on U.S. military bases in the Gulf region.

    The recent escalation worsened a fragile ceasefire, causing oil prices to spike sharply. Iran confirmed striking U.S. military installations in Bahrain and Kuwait, following U.S. retaliations against Iranian sites after strikes on commercial ships in the Strait of Hormuz.

    This flare-up further disrupted hopes of formalizing the June 17 memorandum into a lasting peace treaty to end the ongoing conflict, which originated with U.S.-Israeli airstrikes on Iran on February 28.

    Rising Oil Prices and Falling Stocks

    Before attending a NATO summit in Turkey, Trump was asked if the agreement was over. He responded, “That’s a very interesting question. To me, I believe it’s over. I don’t want to deal with them.”

    “They are sick people. They are led by sick people,” he added. “As far as I’m concerned, negotiating is pointless.”

    Despite Trump’s occasional backing off from aggressive rhetoric, markets reacted with an immediate jump in oil prices and a decline in equities following his comments.

    A source familiar with the Ankara discussions said Trump’s later remarks at the NATO summit did not echo his initial statement about ending the interim deal.

    The renewed violence has also heightened security concerns in the Strait of Hormuz, with shipping data indicating that at least four oil and gas tankers have turned back rather than attempt to traverse the vital waterway.

    Oil prices surged and global bond markets experienced declines. Brent crude jumped over 5% to $78.48 per barrel, marking the largest single-day increase since late May, adding inflationary pressures amid depleted global oil inventories.

    Blame Game: Iran and U.S. Accuse Each Other

    Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) claimed responsibility for targeting U.S. military sites in Bahrain and Kuwait and also reported shooting down a U.S. MQ-9 drone attempting to interfere with operations.

    Bahrain’s armed forces later said they had thwarted Iranian attacks.

    The U.S. responded with new military strikes and revoked an oil sales license for Iran following attacks on three vessels in the Strait of Hormuz.

    According to Central Command, over 60 small boats operated by the IRGC were among the targets struck in an operation intended to impose heavy costs on Iran for violations of the ceasefire, especially regarding attacks on maritime shipping.

    “Iranian forces’ unwarranted aggression is a serious violation of the ceasefire and threatens navigation freedom,” said Centcom in a statement.

    NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte expressed that the recent U.S. strikes against Iran were “absolutely necessary” prior to the NATO summit. Meanwhile, EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas issued a statement on X (formerly Twitter), condemning the escalation: “The exchanges of fire between the U.S. and Iran complicate already delicate negotiations to end the conflict. Iran’s attacks on Bahrain and Kuwait are unacceptable.”

    Iran’s top military command, Khatam al-Anbiya Central Headquarters, condemned the U.S. strikes as “a blatant act of aggression” and warned of a “crushing response,” asserting Iran would defend its interests and territorial waters against U.S. interference.

    Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf accused the U.S. of breaching the ceasefire agreements, citing recent military actions, renewed sanctions, violations of Iran’s “adjustments” in the Strait, and Israeli attacks on Lebanon as evidence of American violations.

    Ghalibaf declared, “The era of bullying and extortion is over. We will not succumb.”

    Iranian media also reported explosions at key oil hubs—Kharg Island, Qeshm Island, and the southern port cities of Sirik and Bandar Abbas—though the U.S. Central Command did not mention Kharg Island, which is responsible for exporting 90% of Iran’s crude oil.

    A U.S. official noted that targets included Iranian air defense batteries, coastal surveillance systems, surface-to-air missile launchers, anti-ship cruise missiles, and drone launch sites.

    So far, no civilian casualties have been reported in Iran.

    Strategic Importance of the Strait of Hormuz

    Controlling the Strait of Hormuz grants Iran significant leverage, effectively allowing it to stymie the military power of the world’s most advanced forces. Analysts often see Iran’s attacks on shipping as a bargaining tool in negotiations for a broader peace agreement with the U.S.

    Under the temporary U.S.-Iran agreement, the U.S. Treasury issued a license on June 22 permitting Iran to sell crude oil and related products through August 21. With the license revoked Tuesday, Iran has until July 17 to wind down all transactions.

    Iran’s foreign ministry called this move a breach of the peace framework, warning that Washington will bear full responsibility for any consequences and stating that Iran could take any measures necessary to defend its interests and security.

  • Key Quotes Shaping the US-Israel-Iran Conflict

    Key Quotes Shaping the US-Israel-Iran Conflict

    As tensions between the US, Israel, and Iran escalated, the Middle East found itself plunged into one of its most precarious periods in years. Global leaders reacted with a mix of threats, warnings, condemnations, and calls for diplomatic solutions.

    From President Donald Trump’s aggressive statements to Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei’s unwavering defiance, the statements highlighted the high stakes—militarily, politically, and diplomatically. Leaders like Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and Chinese President Xi Jinping also voiced their concerns, prioritizing efforts to de-escalate the situation, reopen dialogue, and prevent the conflict from spreading further across the region.

    Below is a quick summary of some of their most significant remarks:

    [Images and quotes included as in the original content.]

  • US and Iran ‘electronically’ sign ceasefire; details undisclosed

    US and Iran ‘electronically’ sign ceasefire; details undisclosed

    A man waves an Iranian flag on the street, following news that the U.S. and Iran have reportedly reached an agreement to end hostilities and reopen the Strait of Hormuz, in Tehran, Iran, June 15, 2026. — Reuters

    – “All parts of the deal are signed,” states President Trump upon arriving in France.
    – Future negotiations will focus on Iran’s nuclear program.
    – Iranian Foreign Minister calls for Israel to cease attacks on Lebanon.

    The U.S. president announced Monday that both the U.S. and Iran have signed a preliminary deal to bring an end to the conflict in the Gulf, although specifics haven’t been disclosed, and a comprehensive, long-term peace agreement still needs to be negotiated. This agreement prolongs a fragile ceasefire that began in April by an additional 60 days and allows for the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, which Iran has effectively blocked since early February following attacks by the U.S. and Israel.

    Negotiations will now tackle complex issues like Iran’s nuclear ambitions moving forward.

    Trump, speaking after arriving in France for the G7 summit, said, “The deal’s all signed,” and mentioned that Vice President JD Vance is expected to participate in a formal signing event in Geneva on Friday.

    Following the announcement, oil futures dropped to their lowest levels since March 10, amid concerns that Iran’s blockade, which has disrupted about 20% of global oil trade, might ease.

    This development marks a significant step toward resolving a conflict that has resulted in at least 7,000 deaths, predominantly in Iran and Lebanon, and has shaken global energy markets. However, many details about the terms of the agreement are still unknown, and it’s unclear whether it differs from the previous ceasefire established in April.

    Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian posted on social media that the US-Iran memorandum of understanding is an “important step” toward ending the fighting, but emphasized that a final agreement for a sustainable ceasefire “has yet to take shape.”

    Vance told CNN that the signed document covers about a page and a half, describing it as a “very general” outline. Officials indicated more details would be made available over the next couple of days. Vance also highlighted that the deal includes “a very substantial sanctions relief package” for Iran.

    Both sides suggest that, ultimately, Iran could see considerable economic benefits, including sanctions relief, the unfreezing of previously held assets, and the creation of a $300 billion reconstruction fund financed by Gulf countries, which host U.S. military bases.

    U.S. officials remain cautious, stating that Iran will need to meet U.S. demands, such as permanently abandoning its nuclear weapons program and halting support for regional militias like Hezbollah, to receive these perks.

    Iran’s nuclear future remains a contentious focus. The 2015 nuclear deal, which Iran agreed in, included significant reductions in its uranium enrichment program, but Trump withdrew from this accord during his first term. Since then, Iran has managed to regain billions in assets that were previously frozen.

    Trump’s recent military actions, including strikes in February, have not resulted in regime change or the dismantling of Iran’s ballistic missile program, nor have they stopped Iran’s regional militias’ support.

    The current agreement does not conclusively address Iran’s stockpile of enriched uranium, a key concern for the U.S., which Trump has insisted should be destroyed or removed.

    Iranian officials, who have always denied aiming to develop nuclear weapons, argue that engaging in diplomatic discussions with the U.S. over their nuclear program resumes a process halted by Trump’s decision to initiate war.

    While the agreement lifts Iran’s control over the Strait of Hormuz, restoring pre-war conditions, shipping companies stress that traffic will only resume once safety assurances are in place. Iran has hinted it may retain oversight with Oman of the strait. The U.S. has committed to keeping the strait open without tolls for 60 days, expecting this to be part of the final deal.

    ### Netanyahu States He “Stood Firm”

    Conflicts between Israel, a U.S. ally, and Hezbollah in Lebanon, where over 1.2 million people have been displaced, remain unresolved. Iran insists the deal requires full cessation of hostility in Lebanon, but Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu declared that Israel will maintain its military presence in southern Lebanon and retain the right to respond to Hezbollah assaults.

    “Israel insisted on staying firm,” Netanyahu said at a press conference, acknowledging differences with President Trump over the issue. Israel has not participated directly in negotiations with Iran.

    A U.S. official highlighted that Israel’s withdrawal from Lebanon, which they invaded in March following Hezbollah’s involvement in the conflict, was not a stipulation of the deal. Disagreements over Lebanese inclusion had also caused friction in the earlier ceasefire.

    On Monday, reports indicated reduced fighting in Lebanon, though clashes did not cease altogether. Lebanese media said an Israeli drone struck a car in Kfar Tebnit, killing the driver, with Netanyahu claiming four militants were killed in the operation. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi called for immediate cessation of Israeli attacks.

    Privately, Israeli officials have voiced negative opinions about the deal, with one senior source telling Reuters that the agreement is “terrible for Israel,” sentiments reportedly shared across the government.

    [End of rewritten content]

  • Factbox: US and Iran Declare Agreement to End Conflict in Memorandum

    Factbox: US and Iran Declare Agreement to End Conflict in Memorandum

    The United States and Iran, with Pakistan serving as a mediator, have announced a preliminary agreement aimed at ending their ongoing conflict.

    Pakistan’s Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif stated that both nations have agreed to an immediate and permanent ceasefire, stopping all military activities right away. The parties plan to sign a memorandum of understanding (MOU) in Switzerland on Friday, which will mark the formal commitment to end hostilities, with Iran’s Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabdi confirming that the MOU will then be made public.

    According to both Iran and the U.S., the Strait of Hormuz will begin reopening, and the U.S. blockade on Iranian ports will be lifted promptly upon signing the agreement. Negotiations to address more complex issues, such as Iran’s nuclear program and U.S. sanctions, are scheduled to continue over the next 60 days.

    Regarding the Strait of Hormuz and Iran’s ports, President Donald Trump announced that the strait would reopen on Friday, and he had ordered the lifting of the maritime blockade. An Iranian official confirmed that the Strait would be accessible to all commercial vessels following the signing. Iran’s semi-official Fars news agency reported that Iran, in coordination with Oman, would oversee the regulation of maritime traffic through the strait.

    On Iran’s nuclear commitments, both sides agreed that Iran will not produce or acquire nuclear weapons—a promise Tehran has reiterated for decades. An Iranian official stated that, until a final agreement is reached, Iran will halt nuclear activities, including uranium enrichment and expanding nuclear facilities. Additionally, the U.S. has agreed that Iran can dilute its stockpile of highly enriched uranium within Iran under a future comprehensive deal. President Trump mentioned that there’s no rush to dismantle Iran’s nuclear stockpile and that the U.S. would do so when stability is restored, with a robust inspection regime potentially in place, though specifics remain unclear. U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham emphasized that any final deal would require congressional review and approval.

    On sanctions and financial matters, Iran’s officials said the U.S. agreed not to impose new sanctions on Iran until the final deal is settled. The U.S. would suspend oil sanctions for a designated period, and upon reaching an agreement, all U.S. and UN sanctions would be lifted according to a mutually agreed timetable. Iran is set to receive approximately $25 billion of its frozen assets, which may be transferred directly, through regional partners, or via credit lines. The U.S., alongside regional allies, will develop a plan for Iran’s reconstruction and development within 60 days. President Trump clarified that Iran would not receive cash directly but that sanctions could be lifted in a way that facilitates financial transactions.

    Regarding Lebanon, Sharif stated that the ceasefire applies there as well. Iran’s Supreme National Security Council confirmed that all military operations would cease by Monday night, including in Lebanon. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi called for a complete halt to Israeli attacks on Lebanon, placing responsibility for implementation on the U.S. Meanwhile, Israel’s Defense Minister Israel Katz affirmed that the Israeli military would maintain its presence in security zones in Lebanon, Syria, and Gaza, with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu reportedly informing Trump of this stance.

  • Iranian Leaders Killed in US-Israel Conflict

    Iranian Leaders Killed in US-Israel Conflict

    During the US-Israeli conflict with Iran, a series of airstrikes resulted in the deaths of several high-ranking officials from the Islamic Republic, starting with Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei. In March, President Donald Trump announced that the campaign had succeeded in forcing a regime change; however, Iran quickly adapted by replacing its slain leaders and continuing its resistance against the US and Israel.

    With an agreement announced Monday to cease hostilities between Washington and Tehran, here is a summary of the key figures who were martyred during the conflict:

    Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei
    Iran’s top leader since 1989 was killed within the first hour of the conflict on February 28 in a strike targeting a meeting of senior officials in Tehran, which also claimed the lives of his daughter-in-law, daughter, and at least one grandchild. His son Mojtaba, who is reportedly injured, survived and has assumed the role of Supreme Leader, but has yet to make a public appearance. Khamenei’s funeral is scheduled for July 9 in Mashhad, his hometown, after three days of ceremonies in Tehran and Qom.

    Security Chief Ali Larijani
    Larijani, a crucial figure for decades despite not being a cleric, was martyred in an Israeli strike on March 17, likely in the Tehran area, which also killed members of his family. The previous week, he publicly demonstrated defiance by attending a pro-government rally in Tehran.

    Revolutionary Guards Commander Mohammad Pakpour
    Pakpour, who had previously commanded the Guards’ ground forces, took on the role of chief commander in June 2025 after Hossein Salami was martyred in Israel’s 12-day war against Iran. He was killed on the war’s first day and has been succeeded by former interior and defense minister Ahmad Vahidi.

    Navy Commander Alireza Tangsiri
    A veteran of the Iran-Iraq war, Tangsiri had led the Guards’ navy since 2018 and was among the highest-profile officials within the Islamic republic. Israel’s defense minister characterized him as the individual responsible for operations like mining and blockading the Strait of Hormuz.

    Advisor Ali Shamkhani
    A longstanding member of Iran’s armed forces since the 1980s, Shamkhani was killed in an airstrike on the first day of the war. His funeral was held publicly in Tehran’s Tajrish Square.

    Intelligence Minister Esmail Khatib
    Khatib, a cleric, was targeted and killed by an Israeli strike early on March 18 in Tehran. Since taking the role in 2021, rights groups have accused him of playing a key part in suppressing protests.

    Defense Minister Aziz Nasirzadeh
    With a service history dating back to the Iran-Iraq war, Nasirzadeh was martyred during the first day of the conflict after serving as defense minister since 2024.

    Basij Commander Gholamreza Soleimani
    Leading the Basij—a volunteer paramilitary group associated with the Revolutionary Guards notorious for protest suppression—Soleimani was killed in an airstrike on March 17.

    Spokesman Ali Mohammad Naini
    Naini was martyred in March during what the Guards described as a “cowardly” attack by the US and Israel. Before his death, he had publicly praised Iran’s missile program, claiming it continued robustly despite the war.

    Head of Military Office Mohammad Shirazi
    Killed on the conflict’s first day, Shirazi was responsible for coordinating between different branches of Iran’s security forces under the Supreme Leader.

    Armed Forces Chief Abdolrahim Mousavi
    Mousavi, also killed on the war’s first day, took office in June 2025 after his predecessor Mohammad Bagheri died during the 12-day conflict. He oversaw coordination between the Guard units and the regular army.

  • Global Conflicts Surge to Peak in 2025: Report

    Global Conflicts Surge to Peak in 2025: Report

    In 2025, the number of global conflicts involving states reached its highest level since World War II, according to a Norwegian study published on Tuesday. Experts warn this surge has led to an increase in violence against civilians. The annual “Conflict Trends” report by the Peace Research Institute Oslo (PRIO) states that 65 conflicts involving at least one government entity were documented last year, marking a peak since 1946.

    The data also shows a record number of interstate conflicts for the past 80 years, doubling from the previous year to eight. These include border clashes between India and Pakistan, Afghanistan and Pakistan, Cambodia and Thailand, along with Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and Israeli military actions against Syria.

    “Unfortunately, there’s not much positive to report,” said researcher Siri Aas Rustad to various media outlets, including AFP. “Usually, I find some silver lining, but this year the numbers are quite shocking.”

    Last year ranked as the third deadliest since the Cold War ended, with approximately 245,000 deaths from direct combat or political violence. Of these, nearly 76,500 were civilians targeted specifically in attacks, compared to around 14,200 in 2024. A significant rise in civilian casualties is tied to the ongoing conflict between the military and paramilitary groups in Sudan, where sieges and massacres in El-Fasher, in the Darfur region, are believed to have killed around 60,000 people.

    Since the Cold War’s conclusion, only 1994 and 2021 have seen higher casualties due to the Rwandan genocide and the Ethiopian Tigray conflict, respectively.

    Africa continues to be the most affected region by conflicts involving at least one state, with 29 such disputes, followed by Asia, the Middle East, the Americas, and Europe. Rustad highlighted Israel as an especially aggressive country at present, citing its involvement in various conflicts across Gaza, Syria, Lebanon, Iran, and Yemen’s Houthi rebels.

    She also pointed to the U.S., noting that the return to power of President Donald Trump has not only escalated violence but also increased trade restrictions. “We’re shutting down cooperation. The UN Security Council isn’t functioning effectively, and the world is becoming more polarized,” Rustad added.

  • Zelenskiy Urges Putin to Enter Peace Talks in Open Letter

    Zelenskiy Urges Putin to Enter Peace Talks in Open Letter

    Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky addressed the nation in an open letter to President Vladimir Putin on Thursday, proposing that the two leaders meet to negotiate an end to more than four years of conflict. Zelensky emphasized that Kyiv is prepared to continue fighting if necessary, but expressed hope for peace.

    He noted that most Russians are weary of the ongoing missile and drone attacks, economic hardship, and fuel shortages in Ukraine, and are seeking stability. Zelensky pointed out that with the U.S. primarily focused on the Iran conflict, waiting for the European situation to regain prominence would be unwise.

    He stressed that the first step toward peace must occur at the frontlines, advocating for a full ceasefire during negotiations—an approach he described as standard practice. Zelensky cited the U.S.’s capacity to oversee ceasefire lines and suggested that a specific date be set for a meeting, mentioning Switzerland, Turkey, and Arab nations as potential host countries for such talks.

    Zelensky urged Putin not to be afraid to pursue a pathway out of the war, framing it as a crucial step. He proposed that Ukraine is willing to resolve the conflict through direct engagement between the two nations, emphasizing that if Russia’s leader does not see it as time to end the war, Ukraine will continue its fight for survival.

    He also implied that ongoing conflict could threaten Putin’s political standing, referencing Russian history: “When Russia gets tired, change happens.”

    The Kremlin responded that they had received Zelensky’s letter and that Putin would be briefed on its contents. Ukrainian Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha announced on social media that the letter would also be officially sent through diplomatic channels, calling it a serious proposal with clear steps and an invitation for a personal meeting.

    Sybiha emphasized the importance of a meaningful response, stating, “It is time to end this war. It’s time for peace.”

  • Insights into the Proposed US-Iran Agreement

    Insights into the Proposed US-Iran Agreement

    More than three months after the U.S. and Israel initiated hostilities against Iran, new optimism is rising that the conflict could be nearing its conclusion. The ongoing war has not only impacted the nations involved but has also sent ripples throughout the global economy. The shutdown of the Strait of Hormuz caused oil prices to soar to record highs, fueled inflation, and slowed economic growth around the world.

    Pakistan, serving as a key mediator, has stepped up diplomatic efforts, with Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi and Army Chief Field Marshal Asim Munir visiting Iran recently. Following these diplomatic moves, former President Donald Trump indicated that Washington and Tehran have made significant progress, with “largely negotiated” a memorandum of understanding aimed at reopening the strait.

    Details about the potential agreement are slowly emerging, shedding light on possible steps toward ending the conflict:

    – Axios reports that the U.S. and Iran are close to signing a deal that includes a 60-day extension of a ceasefire.
    – During this period, the Strait of Hormuz would be reopened.
    – Iran would have the freedom to sell oil without restrictions, and negotiations on curbing Iran’s nuclear program would be underway.
    – The Strait would be open without tolls, and Iran would agree to clear mines it placed to facilitate safe passage for ships.
    – In exchange, the U.S. would lift sanctions on Iranian ports and issue waivers to allow Iran to sell oil more freely.

    The Iranian news agency Tasnim highlights that the potential memorandum of understanding (MoU) would include:

    – U.S. sanctions on Iranian oil being waived.
    – Emphasis on ending hostilities across all fronts, including Lebanon.
    – A 30-day window for protocols related to the Strait and the end of the blockade.
    – A 60-day timeline for nuclear negotiations.
    – Iran has not yet committed to any specific actions regarding its nuclear program.
    – Part of Iran’s frozen assets would be released in the initial phase, contingent upon the agreement’s terms.
    – The release mechanism for remaining assets would be defined during negotiations.
    – If a deal is reached, the Strait will not revert to pre-war conditions immediately, but the number of ships passing through will return to normal within 30 days.
    – Iran underscores its sovereignty over the Strait and plans to assert control in various unspecified ways, to be announced later.
    – The complete lifting of the naval blockade is expected within 30 days; failure to do so means no change in the Strait’s status.
    – Passage conditions will depend on the U.S. fulfilling other commitments outlined in the agreement.
    – A withdrawal of U.S. forces from Iran’s vicinity is also emphasized by Tehran.
    – Negotiations remain stalled on a few clauses, with some sources warning that obstacles from the U.S. side may prevent a final agreement.