الوسم: nuclear talks

  • Iran Considers US Reply via Pakistan as Trump Opposes Deal Terms

    Iran announced it has received a reply from the United States regarding its latest peace proposal, a day after President Donald Trump indicated he would likely decline it because “they haven’t paid a big enough price.” Iranian state media reported that Washington delivered its response through Pakistan, and Tehran is now scrutinizing it. No confirmation has been provided from Washington or Islamabad.

    Iran’s Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei stated, “Currently, we are not engaged in nuclear negotiations,” implying Iran’s proposal to delay talks on nuclear issues until after the conflict ends and sanctions blocks are lifted. Meanwhile, Trump remarked that he had not yet reviewed the details but anticipated rejecting the offer, asserting it didn’t meet the “big enough price” Iran should pay for its actions over the past 47 years.

    The U.S. and Israel suspended their bombing activities against Iran four weeks ago, with one round of diplomatic talks taking place. However, further negotiations are yet to be scheduled. Iran’s latest proposal, delivered Thursday, envisions terminating the war and resolving shipping blockades first, leaving nuclear discussions for later.

    While Trump initially expressed dissatisfaction with Iran’s proposal, he said he was still assessing it. “They’ve shared their deal concept with me. I’m getting the precise wording now,” he told reporters. When asked if he might resume military strikes, he replied, “That’s a possibility. We’ll see what happens if they misbehave or do something wrong.”

    Iran’s plan to postpone nuclear talks appears to conflict with U.S. demands that Iran accept strict limits on its uranium enrichment before easing hostilities. Washington insists Iran must surrender its stockpile of over 900 pounds of highly enriched uranium, which U.S. officials assert could be weaponized. Iran maintains its nuclear program is peaceful and has been willing to discuss some restrictions in exchange for sanctions relief, as outlined in the 2015 deal that Trump withdrew from.

    President Trump, under pressure from domestic concerns about rising fuel prices and Iran’s control over the Strait of Hormuz—which accounts for 20% of global oil and gas shipments—has been cautious. The Strait’s closure continues to impact global markets, fueling calls for urgent diplomatic solutions.

    Iran’s 14-point proposal includes withdrawing U.S. forces from regional bases, lifting sanctions, releasing frozen assets, paying compensation, ending conflicts worldwide, including in Lebanon, and establishing a new mechanism to regulate the Strait. Iran has also blocked most Gulf shipping for over two months, with the U.S. imposing a shipping blockade last month.

    A senior Iranian official characterized the new proposal as a major shift, aiming to facilitate negotiations by moving nuclear talks to a later stage, after resolving broader issues. He suggested this approach creates a more favorable environment for comprehensive agreements.

    Meanwhile, tensions escalated in southern Lebanon, as Israel ordered thousands of Lebanese residents to evacuate villages amid ongoing conflict with Iran-backed Hezbollah. Israel’s invasion in March targeted Hezbollah positions after the group fired projectiles across the border in support of Tehran. Although Lebanon and Israel reached a tentative ceasefire last month, hostilities persist on a smaller scale. The Israeli military warned residents to move at least 1,000 meters from Hezbollah targets, warning of ongoing operations and potential risks to civilians near the group’s fighters and facilities.

  • Iran’s Ballistic Missile Arsenal: An Overview

    Iran’s Ballistic Missile Arsenal: An Overview

    Iran is currently in Geneva for a new round of nuclear negotiations with the United States, with missile capabilities remaining a key sticking point.

    Here’s an overview of Iran’s missile program:

    What are ballistic missiles?
    Ballistic missiles are rocket-propelled weapons guided during the ascent phase but then follow a free-fall path for most of their flight. They carry warheads that can contain conventional explosives or potentially biological, chemical, or nuclear agents, and are capable of striking targets over various distances.

    Western nations see Iran’s missile stockpile both as a conventional threat to stability in the Middle East and as a possible delivery route for nuclear weapons if Tehran advances that program. Iran insists it has no intention of developing atomic bombs.

    Types and Ranges of Iranian Missiles
    Iran’s ballistic missile stockpile is the largest in the Middle East, according to U.S. intelligence estimates. Its declared maximum range is roughly 2,000 km (1,240 miles), which Iranian officials claim is sufficient to defend the country, particularly with the ability to reach Israel.

    Most missile sites are located around Tehran, with at least five underground “missile cities” across provinces like Kermanshah and Semnan, as well as near the Gulf.

    The missile arsenal includes several that can reach Israel, such as the Sejil, with a 2,000 km range; Emad, capable of 1,700 km; Ghadr, also about 2,000 km; Shahab-3, with a range of around 1,300 km; Khorramshahr, reaching 2,000 km; and Hoveyzeh, with approximately 1,350 km.

    In April 2025, Iranian state media displayed a graphic claiming nine missiles can reach Israel, including the Sejil, which reportedly travels over 17,000 km/h with a maximum range of 2,500 km; the Kheibar with a 2,000 km range; and the Haj Qasem at 1,400 km.

    The Arms Control Association estimates Iran’s missile capabilities include the Shahab-1 (300 km range), Zolfaghar (700 km), Shahab-3 (800–1,000 km), and developmental models like Emad-1 (2,000 km) and Sejil variants (1,500–2,500 km).

    Recent and Past Uses
    In June 2025, during a 12-day conflict with Israel, Iran launched ballistic missiles into Israeli territory, resulting in casualties and structural damage. Analysts suggest Iran managed to disable roughly one-third of its missile launchers during the conflict but claims to have recovered.

    Iran also responded militarily to U.S. involvement in the conflict, including missile fire at al-Udeid Air Base in Qatar, after issuing advance warnings. Additionally, Iranian forces targeted Israeli spy facilities in Iraqi Kurdistan in January 2024 and launched missiles at U.S. forces in Iraq in 2020 following the killing of Major General Qassem Soleimani by a U.S. drone strike.

    Development and Modernization Strategies
    Iran claims its missile program acts as a deterrent and serves as a retaliatory force against the U.S., Israel, and other regional threats.

    Recent reports indicate Iran continues underground missile depot construction, complete with transportation, firing, production, and storage facilities. In 2020, Iran successfully launched a missile from underground, marking a new capability.

    Iran has been developing lighter, composite materials for missile airframes to extend range through reverse-engineering efforts influenced by North Korean and Russian designs, with Chinese assistance also playing a role.

    In June 2023, Iran unveiled its first domestically produced hypersonic missile, capable of speeds exceeding five times the speed of sound—complex to intercept.

    The broader missile program includes cruise missiles like the Kh-55, which can be launched from aircraft and has a range of up to 3,000 km.

  • Trump’s Curiosity and Araqchi’s Defiance Drive US-Iran Nuclear Talks

    Trump’s Curiosity and Araqchi’s Defiance Drive US-Iran Nuclear Talks

    Iran and the United States are preparing for a third round of nuclear negotiations in Geneva amid renewed diplomatic signals, rising tensions, and cautious optimism from both parties as they continue discussions about Tehran’s nuclear program.

    Oman’s Foreign Minister, Badr Albusaidi, announced Sunday that the third round of talks would occur Thursday, as concerns grow over the potential for broader military conflict between the long-standing adversaries. The U.S. has increased its military presence in the Middle East, with President Donald Trump warning of serious consequences if an agreement to resolve Iran’s nuclear issue isn’t reached.

    Albusaidi confirmed that indirect negotiations are set for Geneva this Thursday, aiming for progress toward a final agreement. Reuters reported that Iran is offering new concessions on its nuclear activities in exchange for the removal of economic sanctions and recognition of its right to peaceful nuclear enrichment. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian shared cautious optimism via social media, noting recent positive signals while keeping open to any scenario.

    U.S. negotiator Steve Witkoff, leading the American team, expressed that President Trump is curious about why Iran hasn’t “capitulated” yet. Witkoff noted, “I don’t want to use the word frustrated… but he’s curious about why they haven’t agreed to curb their nuclear program.” Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi responded on X (formerly Twitter), questioning, “Curious to know why we do not capitulate? Because we are Iranian,” and indicated that a diplomatic solution remains possible.

    Iran has consistently denied seeking nuclear weapons. Last year’s indirect talks failed mainly over a U.S. demand that Iran cease uranium enrichment on its soil—Washington perceives this as a pathway to nuclear arms. While Israel and the U.S. conducted strikes on Iranian nuclear sites in June, significantly curbing Iran’s uranium enrichment, Iran still retains stockpiles of enriched material, which the U.S. wants to see relinquished.

    Witkoff warningly noted that Iran’s uranium enrichment has surpassed civilian levels, reaching up to 60% fissile purity, bringing Iran close (about a week away) from material suitable for bomb-making—an extremely dangerous situation. Iran is contemplating new concessions, including exporting half of its highly enriched uranium and diluting the rest.

    Meanwhile, Washington aims to broaden the scope of negotiations to include Iran’s missile program and support for regional armed groups, though Iran publicly resists this expansion. There are ongoing disagreements over the scope and procedure for lifting sanctions; an Iranian official indicated differing views between Iran and the U.S.

    Witkoff also mentioned meeting with Reza Pahlavi, an opposition figure and son of the shah deposed during Iran’s 1979 revolution, on Trump’s orders. Pahlavi has been vocal about the potential benefits of U.S. intervention and urged swift negotiations, especially amid recent unrest in Iran involving significant violence.

  • Iran Foreign Minister: Progress Achieved in US Nuclear Talks

    Iran Foreign Minister: Progress Achieved in US Nuclear Talks

    Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi stated that progress has been made on the core guiding principles during a second round of nuclear negotiations in Geneva. He urged the United States to cease threatening the use of force against Iran, expressing hope that these talks will eventually lead to a sustainable, negotiated resolution.

    Following the discussions, Araghchi told Iranian media that while an agreement isn’t imminent, the process has officially begun. Earlier reports indicated Iran planned to temporarily block a section of the Strait of Hormuz—a critical global oil route—during the negotiations, amid U.S. military efforts pressing Iran for concessions.

    U.S. President Donald Trump has mentioned that “regime change” in Tehran might be the best outcome, whereas Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei emphasized that any U.S. attempts to overthrow his government would fail. As Geneva talks commenced, Iranian state media announced a brief closure of parts of the Strait of Hormuz for “security reasons” during military exercises by Iran’s Revolutionary Guards. Iran has previously threatened to shut down the strait in response to attacks, which would significantly disrupt global oil supplies and hike crude prices.

    In the negotiations, U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner participated alongside Araghchi, with Oman serving as mediator, according to a source familiar with the matter. During a disarmament conference in Geneva, Araghchi called on the U.S. to immediately stop threats of force against Iran, asserting that any enduring agreement must acknowledge Iran’s legitimate rights. He expressed optimism, stating, “A new window of opportunity has opened, and we are hopeful negotiations will lead to a sustainable, negotiated solution.”

  • Iran Insists on Enrichment Rights, Prepared for Trust-Building

    Iran Insists on Enrichment Rights, Prepared for Trust-Building

    Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi emphasized that the country will not accept a policy of “zero enrichment.” Recognizing Iran’s right to enrich uranium is essential for success in nuclear negotiations with the United States, he stated. Iran is open to discussions regarding the permitted levels and purity of enrichment, provided it can continue enriching uranium on its soil, with the goal of establishing trust that such activity remains peaceful.

    Last year, Iran and the U.S. engaged in five rounds of nuclear talks, which largely stalled due to disagreements over uranium enrichment. In June, the U.S. conducted strikes on Iranian nuclear sites following a 12-day Israeli bombing campaign. Since then, Tehran has claimed it has halted enrichment activities—an action the U.S. sees as a potential step toward developing nuclear weapons—while Iran insists its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes only.

    A regional diplomat informed Reuters that Iran is willing to negotiate the “level and purity” of enrichment, as long as it is allowed to enrich uranium domestically and gain sanctions relief alongside military de-escalation. Araqchi added, “Iran’s insistence on enrichment is rooted in a desire for independence and dignity. No one has the right to dictate what the Iranian nation can or cannot have.”

    He also clarified that Iran’s missile program, which the U.S. would like to include in negotiations, has never been on the agenda. President Masoud Pesseshkian described recent talks with the U.S. as a “step forward,” reaffirming Iran’s desire for its rights under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty to be respected.

    The scheduling and location of the next negotiation session will be decided in consultation with Oman, possibly not in Muscat.

  • Iran President: US Talks to Advance Within ‘National Interests’

    Iran President: US Talks to Advance Within ‘National Interests’

    Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian confirmed on Tuesday that he has ordered the initiation of nuclear negotiations with the United States, following a threat from President Donald Trump warning of “bad consequences” if an agreement isn’t reached.

    “In response to requests from friendly regional governments concerning the proposal from the U.S. President for negotiations, I have directed my Foreign Minister to pursue honest and fair discussions, provided the environment is suitable—free from threats and unrealistic expectations,” Pezeshkian announced on X.

    He emphasized that these negotiations will align with Iran’s national interests.

    Additionally, the United States has deployed an aircraft carrier group to the Middle East amid ongoing anti-government protests in Iran, which reached a peak last month.

    Trump remains optimistic about reaching a deal with Iran but cautioned that “bad things could happen” if negotiations fail.

    Iran has insisted that diplomacy is the preferred route and has vowed a strong response to any acts of aggression. The country has also made it clear that discussions should focus solely on its nuclear program, rejecting talks over missile development or military capabilities.

    In a CNN interview broadcast on Monday, Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi expressed confidence that a nuclear agreement with the U.S. is attainable.

    “We see a real possibility for renewed talks if the U.S. negotiation team adheres to Trump’s stance—that of reaching a fair and equitable deal ensuring Iran does not develop nuclear weapons,” Araghchi stated.

    “With such an approach, I believe we can successfully reach an agreement,” he added.

    Meanwhile, Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, warned of a “regional war” if the U.S. attacks his country.

  • Iran’s Leader Declines US Cooperation Over Support for Israel

    Iran’s Leader Declines US Cooperation Over Support for Israel

    Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei stated on Monday that Tehran would consider resuming cooperation with the United States only if there was a fundamental change in U.S. policies in the Middle East, particularly regarding support for Israel. “If they fully abandon backing the Zionist regime, withdraw their military bases from the region, and stop meddling here, then we can think about cooperation,” Khamenei explained. He emphasized that “The United States’ arrogance leaves no room but for total submission.”

    In June, Israel initiated an extensive bombing campaign against Iran, leading to a brief conflict involving the U.S. which targeted Iranian nuclear sites. The 12-day clashes, including missile and drone strikes by Iran in response, disrupted nuclear negotiations that had commenced in April between Tehran and Washington. A ceasefire has been in place since June 24.

    Khamenei added that a nation’s strength discourages enemies, asserting that “If Iran grows stronger and opponents realize that attacking a powerful nation results in losses rather than gains, the country will develop immunity.” Iran remains under strict international sanctions, particularly following the U.S. withdrawal from a key nuclear deal in 2018 and the reimposition of sanctions. The UN reimposed sanctions in September after Britain, France, and Germany activated the “snapback” mechanism.

    Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, in a recent interview with Al Jazeera, indicated Tehran’s readiness to negotiate with Washington solely on its nuclear program and rejected talks on missile capabilities. “We are prepared to start negotiations whenever the Americans show genuine interest and come to the table with equal footing and mutual respect. But neither side is in a hurry,” he said.

  • Iran Condemns ‘Unjust’ Reimposition of UN Sanctions

    Iran Condemns ‘Unjust’ Reimposition of UN Sanctions

    On Sunday, Iran condemned the reimposition of United Nations sanctions over its nuclear program as “unjustifiable,” following failed talks with Western powers and Israeli and US strikes on its nuclear installations. The sanctions, which restrict dealings related to Iran’s nuclear and missile activities, were reinstated overnight after Western nations triggered the “snapback” mechanism under the 2015 nuclear deal.

    The Iranian foreign ministry issued a statement deeming the reactivation of previously annulled resolutions as “legally unfounded and unjustifiable,” emphasizing that all countries should avoid recognizing this “illegal situation.” They affirmed Iran’s commitment to defending its national rights and interests, warning that any actions undermining its sovereignty would be met with a strong response.

    This move marks the conclusion of several months of tense diplomacy aimed at renewing nuclear negotiations, which have been stalled since June after Israeli and US attacks on Iranian nuclear sites. Despite the sanctions’ reimposition, Western officials underscored that dialogue channels remain open.

    European Union’s top diplomat, Kaja Kallas, stated that the sanctions should not be viewed as the end of diplomatic efforts. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio called on Iran to accept “direct, good-faith negotiations” and urged UN member states to implement sanctions swiftly to pressure Iran’s government for better outcomes for their nation and global safety.

    Foreign ministers from Britain, France, and Germany expressed a shared desire to pursue a diplomatic solution to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons. However, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian dismissed the possibility of negotiations that would introduce “new problems,” asserting Iran’s readiness to face any situation by standing firm, relying on the strength of its people, and moving forward with dignity.

    Although Iran had allowed UN inspectors access to its nuclear sites, Pezeshkian criticized a US proposal requiring Iran to give up its entire stockpile of enriched uranium—calling it unacceptable. An effort by Russia and China to delay sanctions until April failed in the Security Council, leading to their implementation early Sunday morning Tehran time. Germany, officially triggering the sanctions alongside Britain and France, stated it had “no choice” because Iran was not fulfilling its commitments, underscoring the importance of preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons while maintaining openness to negotiations.

    Reactions within Iran’s media landscape varied: conservative outlets like Kayhan argued sanctions would have been imposed regardless of negotiations, while reformist papers like Ham Mihan questioned whether Russia and China would maintain their support. Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov reaffirmed Moscow’s stance that it would not enforce the sanctions.

    The measures are the “snapback” of sanctions frozen since 2015, when Iran agreed to limits on its nuclear program under a deal negotiated by former President Barack Obama. The US had already imposed extensive sanctions after President Trump withdrew in his first term. This year, Iran and the US engaged in several rounds of talks brokered by Oman, but these collapsed following Israeli and US strikes.

    On the economic front, Iranians expressed concern that the sanctions would deepen economic hardships. An engineer, requesting anonymity, remarked that the country’s already difficult economic situation would worsen, citing rising exchange rates and higher prices. The Iranian rial hit a record low, trading at approximately 1.12 million to the US dollar on the black market, according to currency tracking sources.

  • Khamenei Labels US Issue “Unsolvable” Amid Nuclear Dispute

    Khamenei Labels US Issue “Unsolvable” Amid Nuclear Dispute

    Iran’s top leader stated that the current relations with the United States are “impossible to resolve,” emphasizing that Tehran will never submit to Washington’s pressure amid tensions over its nuclear activities. According to state media reports on Sunday, Iran has halted nuclear negotiations with the U.S. following a 12-day conflict in June, during which Israel and the U.S. targeted Iranian nuclear facilities.

    This comes after Iran and European nations reached an agreement on Friday to restart negotiations aimed at reviving the deal to limit Tehran’s nuclear advancements. Khamenei accused external forces of trying to make Iran compliant with America, asserting, “The Iranian people will stand firm against those who harbor such misguided expectations.” He further criticized calls for Iran to avoid slogans against the U.S. and to engage in direct talks, declaring that “this problem is unsolvable.”

    France, the UK, and Germany have warned they might invoke a “snapback” mechanism at the United Nations to reimpose sanctions if Iran does not return to negotiations. While Western countries allege Iran is progressing toward nuclear weapons development, Iran maintains its nuclear program is solely for peaceful energy purposes.

  • Iran and Europe Engage in “Frank” Nuclear Talks as UN Sanctions Loom

    Iran and Europe Engage in “Frank” Nuclear Talks as UN Sanctions Loom

    Iran announced it will proceed with nuclear negotiations alongside European countries after “serious, open, and detailed” discussions on Friday, marking the first face-to-face meeting since Israel and the U.S. conducted strikes last month. Prior to this gathering in Istanbul, Iran dismissed calls to extend the UN resolution that ratified the 2015 nuclear deal, which is now approaching its expiration. The deal aimed to restrict Iran’s nuclear activities in exchange for sanctions relief.

    Delegates from the European Union and the E3 group—comprising France, Britain, and Germany—met Iranian representatives for roughly four hours at Iran’s consulate. The UN nuclear watchdog suggested this could pave the way for renewed inspections in Iran. Afterward, Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi stated that both sides shared specific proposals concerning sanctions relief and nuclear matters. He emphasized that Iran criticized Western positions on recent aggression against its people and clarified its own stance, including on the “snapback” mechanism. Both sides agreed to continue consultations on these issues.

    The remaining parties to the 2015 agreement—China, Russia, and the E3 countries—are working to prevent the full expiration of the deal on October 18, when UN sanctions are set to lift unless the snapback mechanism is triggered beforehand. This process would automatically reimpose sanctions targeting sectors like energy, banking, and defense, should Iran fail to meet commitments. Diplomats have set a deadline at the end of August to rejuvenate diplomacy, with hopes that Iran will take tangible steps to secure an extension of up to six more months.

    To do so, Iran must commit to critical issues: engaging in negotiations with Washington, fully cooperating with the IAEA, and accounting for 400 kilograms of highly enriched uranium, believed to be near-weapons grade, whose whereabouts have been unknown since last month’s strikes. Iran’s foreign ministry has dismissed discussions about extending the UN resolution as “meaningless and baseless.” Meanwhile, IAEA director Rafael Grossi remains optimistic about restoring nuclear inspections this year and stressed the importance of resolving technical issues now. He noted that discussions should consider Iran’s perspective on necessary precautions.

    Before the recent strikes, the U.S. held five rounds of talks with Iran, with President Donald Trump claiming that these efforts had “obliterated” Iran’s nuclear program, which Washington and Israel allege is aimed at developing nuclear weapons. However, NBC News reports that current and former U.S. officials indicate that while most damage was done to one of three targeted nuclear sites, the other two sites were not as severely impacted. Iran continues to deny seeking nuclear weapons, asserting its program is solely for civilian purposes.

  • Iran and Europe start nuclear talks amid UN sanctions concerns

    Iran and Europe start nuclear talks amid UN sanctions concerns

    Iran refused to consider extending the UN resolution that approved the 2015 nuclear deal as it held its first face-to-face negotiations with Western countries since Israel and the US carried out recent airstrikes on its territory. Delegates from Iran, the European Union, and the E3 group—comprising France, Britain, and Germany—gathered at the Iranian consulate in Istanbul for discussions.

    These countries, along with China and Russia, remain involved in the 2015 agreement—though the US withdrew from it in 2018—that lifted sanctions on Iran in exchange for limits on its nuclear program. An approaching deadline on October 18 marks when the current resolution ceasing sanctions will expire unless a “snapback” mechanism is activated at least 30 days prior. If triggered, this would automatically reinstate sanctions targeting sectors like energy, banking, and defense.

    Diplomats have set a late August deadline to resume diplomatic efforts and hope Iran will take tangible steps to extend the deadline by up to six months. Iran faces commitments to discuss negotiations with Washington, fully cooperate with the International Atomic Energy Agency, and account for approximately 880 pounds of highly enriched uranium, which has been unaccounted for since last month’s strikes.

    Just before the talks started, Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei told IRNA news agency that Iran views discussions about extending UN Security Council Resolution 2231 as “meaningless and baseless.” Previously, the US conducted five rounds of negotiations with Iran before launching airstrikes in June, which President Donald Trump claimed had “obliterated” Iran’s nuclear ambitions, which Washington and Israel assert aim at developing a nuclear weapon.

    However, NBC News reported that US officials, both current and former, believe the strikes damaged most of one of the three targeted Iranian nuclear sites, but not as severely affected the other two. Iran denies seeking nuclear weapons. European and Iranian representatives agree current circumstances don’t favor Iran re-engaging in negotiations with the US.

  • Iran Prepared to React to Any New Attack, Asserts Supreme Leader

    Iran Prepared to React to Any New Attack, Asserts Supreme Leader

    Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei at an Ashura ceremony in Tehran, Iran, July 5, 2025. — Reuters

    • Khamenei praises Iran’s preparedness to confront the U.S. and Israel.
    • Encourages diplomats to follow unspecified “guidelines.”
    • “Iran targeted a crucial U.S. regional base.”

    Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei stated on Wednesday that Iran is fully prepared to counter any fresh military aggression, asserting that the nation is capable of inflicting a stronger retaliation than it did during the recent 12-day conflict with Israel.

    “It is commendable that our nation stands ready to confront the might of the United States and its ally, the Zionist regime [Israel],” Khamenei said during a broadcast on state television.

    Last month, the U.S. and Israel carried out strikes against Iran’s nuclear facilities, claiming it was part of a program aimed at developing nuclear weapons. However, Tehran insists its nuclear program is strictly for civilian applications.

    Khamenei remarked, “The location targeted by Iran was an extremely significant American base in the region,” referring to an Iranian missile strike on the Al Udeid base in Qatar. He added, “An even greater impact could be delivered against the U.S. and its allies.”

    Amid increasing pressure, Iran is expected to resume nuclear negotiations with the U.S., as Washington and three major European nations have set a deadline for the end of August to finalize a deal.

    Should negotiations stall, France’s foreign minister indicated that international sanctions could be reinstated via the United Nations snapback mechanism.

    “In both diplomacy and military engagements, we enter with strength, not weakness,” Khamenei emphasized.

    He instructed diplomats to adhere to certain “guidelines” and to continue their efforts vigorously without going into specifics.

    Iran’s legislature released a statement on Wednesday asserting that the country should refrain from resuming nuclear talks with the U.S. until all prior conditions are met.

    “When the U.S. uses negotiations as a tactic to mislead Iran and mask a sudden military action by the Zionist regime [Israel], then discussions cannot proceed as usual. Preconditions must be established, and no new talks will occur until these are fulfilled,” the statement read.

    Though the specifics of these preconditions were not outlined, Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi had previously indicated the need for assurances against further attacks on Tehran.

    Prior to the 12-day conflict, Tehran and Washington had engaged in five rounds of indirect negotiations facilitated by Oman, but talks stalled over U.S. demands for Iran to cease its domestic uranium enrichment activities.

    Last week, Araqchi reaffirmed Tehran’s stance, stating that Iran would not consent to any nuclear agreement that restricts its ability to enrich uranium and would not entertain discussions on non-nuclear matters such as its ballistic missile program.

  • Iran’s President Claims Assassination Plot by Israel

    Iran’s President Claims Assassination Plot by Israel

    Iran’s President Masoud Pezeshkian speaks at a press conference in Tehran. — Reuters

    • Pezeshkian claims the U.S. did not orchestrate the attack on his life.
    • He alleges that Israel attempted to bombard the venue of their meeting.
    • Over 900 deaths reported in Iran amid the 12-day conflict with Israel.

    In an interview released on Monday, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian claimed that Israel had made an assassination attempt against him following a recent 12-day conflict with the nation.

    This statement comes on the heels of Israel’s unprecedented bombing campaign starting on June 13, which resulted in numerous fatalities among high-ranking military officials and nuclear scientists in Iran.

    The Israeli strikes occurred just two days before scheduled nuclear negotiations between Tehran and Washington, effectively halting talks aimed at securing a deal regarding Iran’s nuclear ambitions.

    “Yes, they did try. They acted on that, but they were unsuccessful,” Pezeshkian told U.S. media personality Tucker Carlson when asked about Israel’s alleged attempt on his life.

    “The United States was not behind this attempt; it was definitely Israel. I was in a meeting when they tried to bomb our location,” he explained, indicating it was a reference to an alleged assassination during the recent conflict.

    The judiciary in Iran has reported that more than 900 people lost their lives during the warfare.

    In retaliation, Israel faced a barrage of drone and missile strikes, resulting in 28 fatalities according to local authorities.

    “Endless Wars”

    The conflict between Iran and Israel included orchestrated strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities located in Fordo, Isfahan, and Natanz.

    A ceasefire came into effect between Iran and Israel on June 24.

    On June 16, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu hinted at the possibility of targeting Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, stating that it could “end the conflict,” referring to earlier discussions where U.S. President Donald Trump reportedly vetoed such a plan.

    During the Carlson interview, Pezeshkian accused Netanyahu of advancing his “own agenda” of prolonged conflict in the Middle East and cautioned that the U.S. should avoid getting entangled.

    “The U.S. government should steer clear of conflicts that do not concern them; this is Netanyahu’s war,” he stated.

    Pezeshkian also mentioned that Iran would be open to resuming nuclear discussions if trust could be rebuilt.

    “We have no objections to re-engaging in negotiations,” he affirmed.

    “However, we must consider how we can trust the United States again,” he added. “We entered discussions before, so how can we be sure that the Israeli regime won’t receive clearance to strike us again during the talks?”

  • Iran Dismisses Nuclear Talks, Blames US for Exaggerating Damage

    Iran Dismisses Nuclear Talks, Blames US for Exaggerating Damage

    Sure, here’s a rewritten and unique version of the content you provided, in American English:



    Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi makes a phone call during the 51st Session of the Council of Foreign Ministers of the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) in Istanbul, Turkey, June 21, 2025. — Reuters

    Iran has made it clear that it has no intention of resuming nuclear negotiations with the United States following recent airstrikes by America on its nuclear facilities. The Iranian government accuses Washington of overstating the repercussions of these strikes.

    The country’s foreign minister dismissed any speculation regarding potential negotiations, stating that no discussions or agreements have been formalized.

    The latest escalation between Israel and Iran has interrupted previous nuclear dialogues. Nevertheless, President Donald Trump indicated that the U.S. was prepared for talks with Tehran next week, expressing optimism for a “comprehensive peace agreement” through his special envoy, Steve Witkoff.

    However, Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi rejected the idea of Tehran being willing to engage in negotiations, labeling it as "speculation" that should not be taken seriously. “I want to assure everyone that no agreements, arrangements, or discussions have been initiated for new negotiations,” he stated during an appearance on state television. “There is currently no plan to commence negotiations.”

    Araghchi’s comments coincided with Iranian lawmakers passing a mandatory bill to suspend collaboration with the UN’s nuclear regulator. This decision came after Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei accused President Trump of exaggerating the consequences of U.S. airstrikes on Iranian nuclear sites.

    In a televised address—his first since a ceasefire declaration in the conflict with Israel—Khamenei celebrated what he considered a victory over Israel, asserting that Iran would not succumb to U.S. pressure and termed Washington’s actions as a humiliating "slap."

    “The American president exaggerated the events in unprecedented ways, indicating he required this exaggeration,” Khamenei declared, dismissing U.S. assertions that Iran’s nuclear program had been significantly set back.

    While he insisted that the airstrikes had no substantial impact on Iran’s nuclear capabilities, Araghchi characterized the damage as "serious," emphasizing that a comprehensive assessment was ongoing. Trump claimed that major facilities, including the underground Fordo uranium enrichment site, had been "obliterated" by U.S. B-2 bombers.

    Through his Truth Social platform, Trump downplayed the idea that Iran had potentially removed enriched uranium before the airstrikes, asserting: “Nothing was taken out… it’s too risky, and way too heavy to move!" He further speculated that satellite images showing trucks at the site were evidence that Iranian crews were attempting to reinforce the facility with concrete.

    Khamenei rebuffed such assertions, stating, "The Islamic Republic triumphed and retaliated with a powerful response to America." Both parties have declared victory—Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu hailed it as a “historic win,” while Khamenei claimed that Iran’s missile response had pushed Israel to the brink of collapse.

    U.S. Defense Perspective

    In Washington, the actual effects of the airstrikes sparked intense political and intelligence debates. A leaked classified report suggested that the damage to Iran’s nuclear program might be less severe than originally indicated, potentially only postponing progress by a few months. This stands in contrast to views expressed by high-ranking U.S. officials.

    CIA Director John Ratcliffe asserted that multiple facilities would need to be “rebuilt over several years.” Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth criticized the media for misrepresenting the operation, noting that the U.S. had employed massive GBU-57 bunker-buster bombs on Fordo and targeted a third facility with submarine-launched Tomahawk missiles.

    “President Trump has set the stage to conclude the conflict, effectively decimating, if not obliterating, Iran’s nuclear capabilities,” stated Hegseth.

    Questions linger about whether Iran discreetly relocated around 400 kilograms (880 pounds) of enriched uranium from its most sensitive sites before the airstrikes, potentially hiding nuclear material elsewhere.

    Netanyahu Claims Victory Over Iran

    Following several Israeli assaults on Iranian nuclear and military installations, and retaliation from Iran since mid-June, the U.S. targeted three significant Iranian nuclear facilities. Initial intelligence reports, first disclosed by CNN, indicated that the strikes did not destroy critical components, merely delaying Iran’s nuclear advancements by months.

    Experts have raised doubts about whether Iran preemptively moved enriched uranium to safeguard it, an assertion the U.S. administration has firmly denied.

    The Israeli military acknowledged that Iran’s nuclear sites sustained a "significant" blow but cautioned that it was "still early" to assess the overall damage. Netanyahu stated that Israel had successfully "thwarted Iran’s nuclear project," warning that any revival efforts from Iran would meet resolute resistance.

    Iran has consistently denied seeking nuclear weapons, defending its "legitimate rights" for peaceful nuclear energy use. Additionally, Iran has expressed readiness to return to nuclear negotiations with the U.S.

    According to Iran’s health ministry, the Israeli strikes resulted in the deaths of at least 627 civilians, while attacks from Iran against Israel caused 28 fatalities, based on Israeli figures.


    This version maintains the essential details from the original but presents them in a unique manner.

  • Trump Issues Stark Warning to Iran Over Potential US Strikes

    Trump Issues Stark Warning to Iran Over Potential US Strikes

    Here’s a rewritten version of the content in American English that’s unique and free from plagiarism:


    Highlights:

    • Nuclear discussions scheduled for Sunday in Oman are cancelled.
    • A missile strike hits residential buildings in Bat Yam, Israel, with 35 people reported missing.
    • An Israeli airstrike targets the South Pars gas field in Iran.

    Tensions Escalate in Israel and Iran

    TEL AVIV/DUBAI: Hostilities between Israel and Iran intensified overnight, prompting a strong response from U.S. President Donald Trump, who stated that the ongoing conflict could be resolved swiftly but cautioned Iran against targeting U.S. interests.

    Israeli rescue teams searched the debris of buildings devastated by strikes, using flashlights and search dogs to find survivors. At least seven individuals were confirmed dead, including children, officials reported.

    Iran has called off nuclear negotiations that were considered crucial by Washington to de-escalate the conflict following Israel’s bombardments. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu indicated that the current assaults represent only a fraction of Israel’s potential military actions in the coming days.

    Trump, via a message on Truth Social, declared, “If Iran attacks us in any way, the full might of the U.S. Armed Forces will strike back with unprecedented strength. However, a deal can easily be reached between Iran and Israel to end this bloody conflict.” He did not elaborate on what such an agreement might involve.

    Reports from Iran indicate that at least 78 people were killed during the first day of the Israeli attacks, with scores more fatalities on subsequent days. This includes a tragic incident where a missile destroyed a 14-story apartment complex in Tehran, resulting in the death of 29 children.

    In retaliation, Iran claimed that the Shahran oil depot was targeted by Israeli airstrikes, although they asserted that the situation was manageable. An Israeli missile attack on an oil refinery near Tehran caused a fire, while further strikes hit Iran’s defense ministry, inflicting minor damage, according to reports from the semi-official Tasnim news agency.

    The latest round of Iranian attacks on Israel began shortly after 11 p.m. on Saturday, with air raid sirens sounding in Jerusalem and Haifa, forcing around a million residents into bomb shelters. By approximately 2:30 a.m. local time, the Israeli military warned of another missile barrage, urging citizens to remain sheltered. Explosions could be heard throughout Tel Aviv and Jerusalem as interceptors were launched in response.

    Yemen’s Iran-aligned Houthis announced on Sunday that they had targeted Jaffa, a city in central Israel, with multiple ballistic missiles for the first time.

    Israel’s ambulance services confirmed that at least seven individuals were killed overnight, among them a 10-year-old boy, a young girl, and a woman in her twenties, with injuries totaling over 140 from various attacks.

    Israeli media stated that at least 35 people were missing after a missile hit an eight-story building in Bat Yam, a city located south of Tel Aviv. Although many were rescued, there were fatalities reported. The extent of damage to other buildings overnight remains unclear.

    To date, at least ten people in Israel have been killed and over 300 injured since the onset of Iranian retaliatory actions on Friday.

    The scheduled U.S.-Iran nuclear talks set for Sunday in Oman have been cancelled, with Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi attributing this to the ongoing "barbarous" Israeli strikes.

    Attack on the Gas Field

    In a noteworthy escalation, the Tasnim news agency reported that Iran has partially halted production at the South Pars gas field, the world’s largest, after it sustained fire damage from an Israeli strike on Saturday. This gas field, located offshore in Iran’s southern Bushehr province, is the primary source of Iran’s gas output.

    An increase in oil prices of 9% on Friday was sparked by concerns over potential disruptions in regional oil exports, even though Israel avoided targeting Iran’s oil and gas sectors in the initial phases of its attack.

    Iranian General Esmail Kosari mentioned that Tehran is reviewing the possibility of closing the Strait of Hormuz, a critical passage for tanker traffic in the Gulf.

    As Israel’s military operations are expected to last several weeks, Netanyahu is calling on the Iranian populace to rise against their clerical leadership, raising fears of a broader conflict involving regional powers.

    Tehran has warned that its military bases in the region could be targeted if they assist in repelling Iranian missiles.

    After 20 months of war in Gaza and a previous conflict in Lebanon, Iran’s influential regional allies, notably Hamas and Hezbollah, have been significantly weakened, limiting Iran’s options for retaliation.

    Israel perceives Iran’s nuclear ambitions as an existential threat, asserting that the current offensive aims to thwart Iran’s final steps toward acquiring nuclear weapon capabilities. Iran contends that its nuclear program is entirely for civilian purposes and denies any intention of developing atomic weapons. However, the UN nuclear watchdog recently reported that Iran is not complying with international non-proliferation treaty obligations.


    Feel free to ask if you need any changes or additional details!

  • Iran Announces Upcoming US Talks Scheduled for Sunday

    Iran Announces Upcoming US Talks Scheduled for Sunday

    Negotiations Set to Resume Between Iran and the U.S.

    Iran has announced that a new round of nuclear negotiations with the United States is scheduled for Sunday. This comes after the U.S. presented a proposal aimed at resolving ongoing disputes related to uranium enrichment.

    The two nations, which have been adversaries for years, have engaged in five rounds of discussions since April. This marks the highest level of diplomatic engagement since former President Donald Trump’s withdrawal from the 2015 nuclear agreement during his first term in office.

    Iran’s Foreign Ministry Spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei stated on Tuesday, "The next session of indirect talks between Iran and the U.S. is set for Sunday in Muscat." Initially, Trump indicated that a meeting might happen on Thursday; however, Baqaei clarified that Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi would be attending the Oslo Forum in Norway, an assembly focused on conflict mediation.

    The upcoming sixth round of discussions follows a U.S. proposal for a nuclear deal received by Tehran roughly two weeks ago. Araghchi criticized the proposal, describing it as containing "ambiguities."

    Iran has expressed that the U.S. proposal lacks crucial elements discussed previously, such as the lifting of sanctions—a major demand from Tehran, which has suffered economically under these restrictions for several years.

    The Iranian government plans to respond with a "reasonable, logical, and balanced" counter-proposal through the mediation of Oman.

    On Monday, Trump mentioned that the forthcoming talks might clarify the feasibility of a nuclear agreement and help prevent potential military action.

    Iran and the U.S. have been involved in a diplomatic standoff regarding Iran’s uranium enrichment, which Tehran defends as an "inviolable" right, while Washington considers it a "red line."

    National Interests at Stake

    Iran has enriched uranium to 60%, far exceeding the 3.67% limit established in the 2015 agreement, although it still falls short of the 90% threshold required for a nuclear weapon.

    Western nations, including the U.S., have accused Iran of intending to develop nuclear weapons, while Tehran insists its nuclear program is solely for peaceful purposes.

    On Tuesday, Iran’s Deputy Foreign Minister Majid Takht-Ravanchi dismissed suggestions of a "deadlock" in the talks with the U.S. He noted, "Any international negotiations come with their own sensitivities and require significant patience to achieve results. Our priority is to protect the nation’s interests through these discussions."

    Takht-Ravanchi indicated that the sixth round would be the first where participants share their perspectives on exchanged written documents. He confirmed that Tehran would restate its position on its enrichment capabilities, consistent with its public statements in the past.

    Meanwhile, the United Nations nuclear watchdog is holding a Board of Governors meeting in Vienna, set to last until Friday, to address Iran’s nuclear activities among other issues.

    This meeting follows a report from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) criticizing Iran for "less than satisfactory" cooperation, particularly in clarifying past nuclear material found at undeclared sites. Iran, in turn, has condemned the IAEA report as biased, alleging it was based on "forged documents" from its primary rival, Israel.

    Araghchi reiterated his criticism of a plan by European and U.S. powers to propose a resolution at the IAEA meeting, which would accuse Tehran of failing to meet its nuclear obligations. He asserted, "Any impulsive and harmful decision by the Board of Governors against Iran will receive a suitable response," during a discussion with Japanese Foreign Minister Takeshi Iwaya.

    Iran has indicated it may reduce its cooperation with the IAEA if such a resolution is adopted.