Skip to content
Home News What Does Win Against Google Mean For Epic?

What Does Win Against Google Mean For Epic?

Epic vs Google

Epic Games has won a lawsuit against Google over its Play Store policies. What are the implications of this victory for Epic and other developers?

Epic Games, renowned for developing the highly popular game Fortnite, recently secured a significant victory in a lawsuit against tech giant Google concerning its Play Store policies. The legal dispute, initiated back in 2020, centered around allegations that Google had been leveraging its market dominance to stifle competition and innovation within the mobile app distribution market. The California jury, after careful consideration, sided with Epic’s claims, deeming Google’s Play Store to be operating as an illegal monopoly. This landmark win holds profound implications not only for Epic Games but also for the broader community of developers dissatisfied with Google’s fees and app restrictions.

The Background of the Lawsuit

The origins of this legal battle trace back to August 2020 when Epic Games introduced a direct payment option within Fortnite, violating Google’s established policies. Responding promptly, Google removed Fortnite from the Play Store. Subsequently, Epic Games filed a lawsuit in the US District Court in California’s Northern District, asserting that Google had been utilizing its influential position to suppress competition and safeguard its Play Store, a lucrative entity generating billions annually.

Epic Games contended that several of Google’s policies were anti-competitive and detrimental to developers and consumers. These policies included charging a commission ranging from 15% to 30% on in-app purchases and subscriptions, mandating developers to use Google’s payment system for in-app transactions, and restricting developers from offering alternative methods for downloading or paying for their apps. Furthermore, Epic Games alleged that Google employed various tactics to prevent smartphone manufacturers from pre-installing third-party app stores or Fortnite on their devices.

The Verdict of the Jury

After a meticulous three-week trial, the California jury delivered its verdict on December 12, 2023. They concluded that Google’s Play Store indeed functioned as an illegal monopoly in the market for app distribution on Android devices. Additionally, the jury found evidence that Google had engaged in unlawful practices to sustain its monopoly power. In a substantial ruling, Epic Games was awarded $1.2 billion in damages, an amount three times the commission paid to Google between 2017 and 2020.

Notably, the jury issued an injunction that restrains Google from enforcing specific policies. This includes preventing developers from offering alternative means of downloading or paying for their apps and restricting communication with customers outside the Play Store. The injunction also mandates Google to allow developers to pre-install their own app stores on Android devices and grants them equal access to Google’s APIs and services. This injunction is slated to take effect in 90 days, unless Google opts to appeal the verdict.

The Implications of the Verdict

The ramifications of this verdict are far-reaching. For Epic Games and other dissatisfied developers, this legal triumph may pave the way for increased innovation and competition within the mobile app distribution market. Developers could potentially gain more autonomy and control over their apps and customer interactions. From a consumer standpoint, the verdict might lead to a broader array of choices and potentially lower prices for apps and in-app purchases.

However, it’s crucial to recognize that this verdict does not mark the end of the legal skirmish between Epic Games and Google. In response to the ruling, Google has already announced its intention to appeal, indicating its commitment to defending its Play Store policies. Additionally, Google has filed a countersuit against Epic Games, accusing them of breaching contractual agreements and violating intellectual property rights. The countersuit is scheduled for trial in 2024, ensuring that the legal saga continues.

In summary, Epic Games’ triumph in the lawsuit against Google signifies a pivotal moment in the ongoing discourse around Play Store policies. The jury’s determination of an illegal monopoly and the substantial damages awarded to Epic Games have the potential to reshape the dynamics of the mobile app distribution market. While the implications are promising for developers and consumers alike, it’s crucial to acknowledge that the legal saga is far from over. Google’s planned appeal and the impending countersuit ensure that this legal battle will persist, shaping the future landscape of app distribution on Android devices.

  • Seok Chen

    Seok Chen is a mass communication graduate from the City University of Hong Kong.